• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险选择与韦伯定律。

Risky choice and Weber's Law.

作者信息

Kacelnik A, Brito e Abreu F

机构信息

Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PS, U.K.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 1998 Sep 21;194(2):289-98. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0763.

DOI:10.1006/jtbi.1998.0763
PMID:9778440
Abstract

We present a family of models of choice between behavioural alternatives with stochastic outcomes (risky choice) based on the effects of Weber's Law in memory. These models generalise and extend a model of risk sensitive foraging originally proposed by Reboreda & Kacelnik [(1991) Behav. Ecol. 2, 301-308], which yielded qualitative predictions (risk-aversion for amount of food and risk-proneness for delay to food). We now demonstrate how this approach can predict quantitatively the partial preferences between two alternative options with any mean and variance in their outcomes, and the certainty equivalent of an option consisting of any set of probabilistic outcomes. The approach is also relevant to the economics and psychology of risk sensitivity because it predicts risk aversion for any desirable outcome (such as monetary gains) and risk seeking for any undesirable gain (such as monetary losses). Our models are process-based rather than purely normative, and are based on linear expected utility as a function of expected outcomes. They do not account for all observed aspects of risky choice, but their descriptive performance betters that of existing functional models and requires fewer parameters.

摘要

我们提出了一系列基于记忆中韦伯定律效应的、在具有随机结果的行为选择之间进行抉择的模型(风险选择)。这些模型推广并扩展了最初由雷博雷达和卡塞尼克[(1991年)《行为生态学》2,301 - 308]提出的风险敏感觅食模型,该模型得出了定性预测(对食物数量的风险厌恶和对获取食物延迟的风险偏好)。我们现在展示这种方法如何能够定量预测两个具有任意均值和方差结果的替代选项之间的部分偏好,以及由任意一组概率性结果组成的选项的确定性等价物。该方法也与风险敏感性的经济学和心理学相关,因为它预测对任何期望结果(如货币收益)的风险厌恶以及对任何不期望收益(如货币损失)的风险寻求。我们的模型基于过程而非纯粹规范性的,并且基于作为期望结果函数的线性期望效用。它们没有考虑风险选择的所有观察到的方面,但它们的描述性能优于现有功能模型,并且所需参数更少。

相似文献

1
Risky choice and Weber's Law.风险选择与韦伯定律。
J Theor Biol. 1998 Sep 21;194(2):289-98. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0763.
2
Predicting risk sensitivity in humans and lower animals: risk as variance or coefficient of variation.预测人类和低等动物的风险敏感性:作为方差或变异系数的风险
Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):430-45. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.430.
3
Effects of monetary reserves and rate of gain on human risky choice under budget constraints.预算约束下货币储备和收益率对人类风险选择的影响。
Behav Processes. 2008 Jul;78(3):358-73. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.01.016. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
4
Application of a computational decision model to examine acute drug effects on human risk taking.应用计算决策模型研究急性药物对人类冒险行为的影响。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 May;14(2):254-64. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.14.2.254.
5
Optimal risky choice in humans: effects of amount of variability.人类的最优风险选择:变异性数量的影响
Behav Processes. 2011 May;87(1):88-99. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.008. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
6
Exaggerated risk: prospect theory and probability weighting in risky choice.风险的夸大:风险选择中的前景理论和概率权重
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1487-505. doi: 10.1037/a0017039.
7
Framing effects and risky decisions in starlings.椋鸟的框架效应与风险决策
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Mar 5;99(5):3352-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.042491999. Epub 2002 Feb 26.
8
A mathematical framework for probabilistic choice based on information theory and psychophysics.基于信息论和心理物理学的概率选择数学框架。
Med Hypotheses. 2006;67(1):183-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.12.045. Epub 2006 Mar 3.
9
Energy budget versus temporal discounting as determinants of preference in risky choice.作为风险选择中偏好决定因素的能量预算与时间贴现
Behav Processes. 2004 Sep 30;67(2):147-56. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.03.019.
10
Risk-sensitive foraging theory and operant psychology.风险敏感觅食理论与操作性心理学。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Nov;56(3):585-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-585.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual risk attitudes arise from noise in neurocognitive magnitude representations.个体风险态度源于神经认知数量表示中的噪声。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Sep;7(9):1551-1567. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01643-4. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
2
Bundling and segregation affect pheromone deposition, but not choice, in an ant.捆绑和隔离会影响蚂蚁信息素的沉积,但不会影响其选择。
Elife. 2022 Nov 22;11:e79314. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79314.
3
Sensorimotor Cortex GABA Moderates the Relationship between Physical Exertion and Assessments of Effort.感觉运动皮层 GABA 调节体力活动与努力评估之间的关系。
J Neurosci. 2022 Aug 3;42(31):6121-6130. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2255-21.2022. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
4
Aversive view memories and risk perception in navigating ants.导航蚂蚁的厌恶视图记忆和风险感知。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 21;12(1):2899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06859-4.
5
High-value decisions are fast and accurate, inconsistent with diminishing value sensitivity.高价值决策快速而准确,与价值敏感性降低不一致。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 8;119(6). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101508119.
6
Two-dimensional reward evaluation in mice.小鼠的二维奖励评估。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Sep;24(5):981-998. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01482-8. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
7
Evaluation of the U.S. governors' decision when to issue stay-at-home orders.对美国州长何时发布居家令的决定进行评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Oct;26(5):1347-1351. doi: 10.1111/jep.13458. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
8
Gains v. losses, or context dependence generated by confusion?得与失,还是困惑产生的语境依赖性?
Anim Cogn. 2020 Mar;23(2):361-366. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01339-1. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
9
Macaques are risk-averse in a freely moving foraging task.猕猴在自由移动的觅食任务中表现出风险规避。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 21;9(1):15091. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51442-z.
10
Affective perception of Euro banknotes: cognitive factors and interindividual differences.欧元纸币的情感感知:认知因素与个体差异。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):121-132. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01240-z. Epub 2019 Aug 31.