• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险敏感觅食理论与操作性心理学。

Risk-sensitive foraging theory and operant psychology.

作者信息

Houston A I

机构信息

University of Oxford.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Nov;56(3):585-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-585.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.1991.56-585
PMID:1774546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1323140/
Abstract

Hastjarjo, Silberberg, and Hursh (1990) have presented data on the foraging behavior of rats and discussed it in terms of risk-sensitive foraging theory. Because risk-sensitive foraging theory is comprised of several different models, it does not lead to general predictions about when an organism should prefer a foraging option with high variance to a foraging option with low variance. Any comparison of data with the predictions of the theory must be based on an appropriate model. I draw attention to various experiments that are potentially relevant to the results reported by Hastjarjo et al. and show how the time period over which the organism must survive can influence a model's predictions about risk sensitivity.

摘要

哈斯特贾约、西尔伯格和赫什(1990年)展示了关于大鼠觅食行为的数据,并依据风险敏感型觅食理论进行了讨论。由于风险敏感型觅食理论由几种不同的模型组成,所以它不会得出关于有机体何时应偏好高方差觅食选项而非低方差觅食选项的一般性预测。将数据与该理论的预测进行的任何比较都必须基于一个合适的模型。我提请大家注意各种可能与哈斯特贾约等人报告的结果相关的实验,并展示有机体必须生存的时间段如何能够影响一个模型关于风险敏感性的预测。

相似文献

1
Risk-sensitive foraging theory and operant psychology.风险敏感觅食理论与操作性心理学。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Nov;56(3):585-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-585.
2
Risky choice and Weber's Law.风险选择与韦伯定律。
J Theor Biol. 1998 Sep 21;194(2):289-98. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0763.
3
The effect of orbital prefrontal cortex lesions on performance on a progressive ratio schedule: implications for models of inter-temporal choice.眶额前皮质损伤对累进比率程序表现的影响:对跨期选择模型的启示
Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jan 6;156(1):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.05.017.
4
Choice behavior in spontaneously hypertensive rats: variable vs. fixed schedules of reinforcement.
Behav Processes. 2010 May;84(1):465-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.12.018. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
5
Appetitive instrumental training in preweanling rats: I. Motivational determinants.断奶前大鼠的食欲性工具性训练:I. 动机决定因素。
Dev Psychobiol. 1983 Mar;16(2):119-28. doi: 10.1002/dev.420160205.
6
Energy budget versus temporal discounting as determinants of preference in risky choice.作为风险选择中偏好决定因素的能量预算与时间贴现
Behav Processes. 2004 Sep 30;67(2):147-56. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.03.019.
7
Reduction of cocaine seeking by a food-based inhibitor in rats.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Aug;15(4):359-67. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.15.4.359.
8
Risky choice as a function of amount and variance in food supply.作为食物供应量和方差函数的风险选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jan;53(1):155-61. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-155.
9
Optimal risky choice in humans: effects of amount of variability.人类的最优风险选择:变异性数量的影响
Behav Processes. 2011 May;87(1):88-99. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.008. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
10
Successive negative contrast effects in a risk-sensitive foraging procedure.在一个风险敏感的觅食程序中连续的负对比效应。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2020 Sep;74(3):244-251. doi: 10.1037/cep0000211.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolutionary origins of temporal discounting: Modeling how time and uncertainty constrain optimal decision-making strategies across taxa.时间折扣的进化起源:跨物种建模时间和不确定性如何约束最优决策策略。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 12;19(11):e0310658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310658. eCollection 2024.
2
Gambling on an empty stomach: Hunger modulates preferences for learned but not described risks.空腹赌博:饥饿调节对习得但未描述风险的偏好。
Brain Behav. 2023 May;13(5):e2978. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2978. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
3
Does the Punishment Fit the Crime (and Immune System)? A Potential Role for the Immune System in Regulating Punishment Sensitivity.惩罚与罪行(及免疫系统)相称吗?免疫系统在调节惩罚敏感性中的潜在作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 22;11:1263. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01263. eCollection 2020.
4
Objective Physiological Measurements but Not Subjective Reports Moderate the Effect of Hunger on Choice Behavior.目的 生理测量而非主观报告调节饥饿对选择行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 23;9:750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00750. eCollection 2018.
5
Risk sensitivity as an evolutionary adaptation.作为一种进化适应性的风险敏感性。
Sci Rep. 2015 Feb 4;5:8242. doi: 10.1038/srep08242.
6
Intersection of effort and risk: ethological and neurobiological perspectives.努力与风险的交集:行为学和神经生物学的视角。
Front Neurosci. 2013 Nov 7;7:208. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00208.
7
State dependent valuation: the effect of deprivation on risk preferences.状态依存估值:剥夺对风险偏好的影响。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053978. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
8
Foraging behavior under starvation conditions is altered via photosynthesis by the marine gastropod, Elysia clarki.在饥饿条件下,海洋腹足纲动物 Elysia clarki 通过光合作用改变觅食行为。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022162. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
9
Risk-sensitivity in sensorimotor control.感觉运动控制中的风险敏感性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Jan 24;5:1. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00001. eCollection 2011.
10
Patrimony and the evolution of risk-taking.遗产与冒险行为的演变。
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 19;5(7):e11656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011656.

本文引用的文献

1
Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules.对混合间隔与固定间隔时间表的偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):247-52. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-247.
2
Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.对混合比率与固定比率时间表的偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jan;10(1):35-43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-35.
3
APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE.非周期性作为选择中的一个因素。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Mar;7(2):179-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-179.
4
On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.关于偏好研究中强化频率的测量。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):263-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-263.
5
A general framework for understanding the effects of variability and interruptions on foraging behaviour.一个用于理解变异性和干扰对觅食行为影响的通用框架。
Acta Biotheor. 1987;36(1):3-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00159228.
6
Risky choice as a function of amount and variance in food supply.作为食物供应量和方差函数的风险选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jan;53(1):155-61. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-155.