Suppr超能文献

开放手术与腹腔镜手术治疗原发性腹股沟疝的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic repair for primary inguinal hernia.

作者信息

Dirksen C D, Ament A J, Adang E M, Beets G L, Go P M, Baeten C G, Kootstra G

机构信息

University Hospital Maastricht.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Summer;14(3):472-83. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300011454.

Abstract

A cost-effectiveness (CE) analysis was performed of Bassini versus laparoscopic repair for primary inguinal hernia. Incremental costs per 1-year recurrence-free patient were calculated for the societal and hospital perspective. From the hospital perspective, the incremental CE ratio of laparoscopic repair is 5.348 guilders. From the societal perspective, laparoscopic repair is both less costly and more effective than Bassini repair. Results were sensitive to assumptions about recurrence rates, laparoscopic operating time, and return to work. Laparoscopic repair should replace Bassini repair in order to benefit society. From the hospital perspective, the decision to accept laparoscopic repair depends on the willingness to pay.

摘要

对原发性腹股沟疝采用巴西尼修补术与腹腔镜修补术进行了成本效益(CE)分析。从社会和医院角度计算了每例无复发1年患者的增量成本。从医院角度看,腹腔镜修补术的增量成本效益比为5.348荷兰盾。从社会角度看,腹腔镜修补术比巴西尼修补术成本更低且更有效。结果对复发率、腹腔镜手术时间和恢复工作的假设敏感。为使社会受益,腹腔镜修补术应取代巴西尼修补术。从医院角度看,是否接受腹腔镜修补术的决定取决于支付意愿。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验