• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型嗅觉测试的临床验证

Clinical validation of a new olfactory test.

作者信息

Kremer B, Klimek L, Mösges R

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;255(7):355-8. doi: 10.1007/s004050050076.

DOI:10.1007/s004050050076
PMID:9783132
Abstract

A new approach to clinical olfactometry is presented using nasal sprays. A special dosage valve was used to standardize an aerosol size to 40 microns. For evaluation a 6 x 6 matrix (substance/olfactory quality) with verbal associative clues was used according to test psychological findings. Validation took place in three steps after determining smell-associated thresholds in preliminary examinations. Recognition of different aromas administered either by spraying into the open mouth from a distance of 5 cm using nasal sprays or sniffing opened bottles was compared in 50 subjectively normosmic subjects. Findings showed that the correspondence between the two procedures was relatively high, with global identification of odorous substances as high as 98.4% in the spray test. The number of substances used was next reduced to those six substances providing the most reproducible results in an investigation with 56 normosmic and 55 hyposmic subjects. Verbal associative clues were also tested. In a last step 50 patients with hyposmia of various origin and 110 normosmic subjects were tested, allowing previous results to be reproduced regardless of the cause of hyposmia. The spray test was shown to be easily performed and was suitable as a screening test, with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 100%.

摘要

本文介绍了一种使用鼻喷雾剂进行临床嗅觉测量的新方法。使用一种特殊的剂量阀将气雾剂大小标准化为40微米。根据测试心理学研究结果,使用带有语言联想线索的6×6矩阵(物质/嗅觉质量)进行评估。在初步检查中确定与气味相关的阈值后,分三步进行验证。在50名主观嗅觉正常的受试者中,比较了通过使用鼻喷雾剂从5厘米远处喷入张开的口腔或嗅闻打开的瓶子来给予不同香气的识别情况。结果表明,两种方法之间的对应性相对较高,在喷雾测试中气味物质的总体识别率高达98.4%。接下来,在一项针对56名嗅觉正常和55名嗅觉减退受试者的研究中,将使用的物质数量减少到六种提供最可重复结果的物质。还对语言联想线索进行了测试。在最后一步中,对50名不同病因的嗅觉减退患者和110名嗅觉正常的受试者进行了测试,结果表明无论嗅觉减退的原因如何,之前的结果都能重现。喷雾测试显示易于实施,适合作为筛查测试,灵敏度为88%,特异性为100%。

相似文献

1
Clinical validation of a new olfactory test.一种新型嗅觉测试的临床验证
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;255(7):355-8. doi: 10.1007/s004050050076.
2
Screening of olfactory function using the Biolfa olfactory test: investigations in patients with dysosmia.使用Biolfa嗅觉测试筛查嗅觉功能:嗅觉障碍患者的调查
Acta Otolaryngol. 2004 Nov;124(9):1063-71. doi: 10.1080/00016480410017990.
3
Application of the European Test of Olfactory Capabilities in patients with olfactory impairment.欧洲嗅觉能力测试在嗅觉障碍患者中的应用。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Feb;273(2):381-90. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3536-6. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
4
Evaluation of the efficacy of the 'nasal airflow-inducing manoeuvre' for smell rehabilitation in laryngectomees by means of the Sniffin' Sticks test.利用“嗅觉测试棒”评估“鼻气流诱导动作”对喉切除术后患者嗅觉康复的疗效。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Feb;36(1):17-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02261.x.
5
SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.SMELL-S 和 SMELL-R:嗅觉测试不受特定嗅觉敏感度或先前嗅觉体验的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 24;114(43):11275-11284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711415114. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
6
Validation study of the "Sniffin' Sticks" olfactory test in a British population: a preliminary communication.“嗅探棒”嗅觉测试在英国人群中的验证研究:初步交流。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb;37(1):23-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2012.02431.x.
7
A Pilot Study of the Snap & Sniff Threshold Test.嗅觉阈值快速检测的初步研究
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2018 May;127(5):312-316. doi: 10.1177/0003489418760055. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
8
A new clinical olfactory test to quantify olfactory deficiencies.一种用于量化嗅觉缺陷的新型临床嗅觉测试。
Rhinology. 1994 Jun;32(2):57-61.
9
A pilot study of the Self-Administered Computerized Olfactory Testing System.自我管理计算机嗅觉测试系统的一项初步研究。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 Mar-Apr;29(2):e55-8. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4177.
10
The candy smell test: a new test for retronasal olfactory performance.糖果气味测试:一种用于鼻后嗅觉功能的新测试。
Laryngoscope. 2009 Mar;119(3):487-95. doi: 10.1002/lary.20123.

引用本文的文献

1
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.国际过敏与鼻科学学会共识声明:嗅觉。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Apr;12(4):327-680. doi: 10.1002/alr.22929.
2
Longer latency of sensory response to intravenous odor injection predicts olfactory neural disorder.静脉注射气味时感觉反应潜伏期延长预示着嗅觉神经障碍。
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 13;6:35361. doi: 10.1038/srep35361.
3
Application of the European Test of Olfactory Capabilities in patients with olfactory impairment.欧洲嗅觉能力测试在嗅觉障碍患者中的应用。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Feb;273(2):381-90. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3536-6. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
4
No acute effects of an exposure to 50 ppm methyl methacrylate on the upper airways.暴露于50 ppm的甲基丙烯酸甲酯对上部气道无急性影响。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015 Nov;88(8):1043-51. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1029-y. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
5
Quantitative measurement of odor detection thresholds using an air dilution olfactometer, and association with genetic variants in a sample of diverse ancestry.采用空气稀释嗅觉计对气味探测阈值进行定量测量,并与多种祖源样本中的遗传变异相关联。
PeerJ. 2014 Nov 6;2:e643. doi: 10.7717/peerj.643. eCollection 2014.
6
Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper.鼻科学诊断工具。EAACI 立场文件。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2011 Jun 10;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-1-2.
7
[Examination of the sense of smell].[嗅觉检查]
HNO. 2007 Oct;55(10):827-37; quiz 838. doi: 10.1007/s00106-007-1593-x.
8
[Olfactory dysfunction due to nasal sinus disease. Causes, consequences, epidemiology, and therapy].[鼻窦疾病所致嗅觉功能障碍。病因、后果、流行病学及治疗]
HNO. 2005 May;53 Suppl 1:S26-32. doi: 10.1007/s00106-005-1233-2.
9
[Olfactory dysfunction. Epidemiology, pathophsiological classification, diagnosis and therapy].[嗅觉功能障碍。流行病学、病理生理分类、诊断与治疗]
HNO. 2004 Aug;52(8):679-84. doi: 10.1007/s00106-004-1117-x.