Thörn A
Karolinska Institutet, Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(9):1307-12. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00206-8.
Sick building syndrome (SBS) is usually defined as an increased occurrence of non-specific symptoms among populations in determined buildings. This definition differs from those of other medical syndromes in that it refers to a system (a building inclusive of its population) rather than to a clinical state in a single individual. Such a definition should make the term SBS impossible to use as a diagnosis applied to individual persons. In spite of this, it is often used in this way, and the aim of the article is to discuss problems with this practice. It is a case study based on an office building with long-standing building-related health problems. Information concerning the building and its inhabitants comes from a large number of separate documentary sources. The study demonstrates that the diagnostic use of SBS suffers from serious weaknesses. It is proposed that such diagnostics could even have a normative force serving to maintain and reinforce building-related, non-specific health problems. It is therefore suggested that the term sick building syndrome should be abandoned.
病态建筑综合症(SBS)通常被定义为特定建筑内人群中出现的非特异性症状增多的情况。这一定义与其他医学综合症的定义不同,因为它指的是一个系统(包括其人群的一座建筑),而非单个个体的临床状态。这样的定义应该使得病态建筑综合症这个术语无法用作针对个体的诊断。尽管如此,它却经常被这样使用,本文的目的就是讨论这种做法存在的问题。这是一个基于一座存在长期建筑相关健康问题的办公楼的案例研究。关于这座建筑及其居住者的信息来自大量不同的文献资料。该研究表明,将病态建筑综合症用于诊断存在严重缺陷。有人提出,这种诊断甚至可能具有一种规范作用,有助于维持和加剧与建筑相关的非特异性健康问题。因此,建议摒弃“病态建筑综合症”这一术语。