• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的交互式健康传播方法:信息时代对医学的一项挑战。交互式传播与健康科学小组。

An evidence-based approach to interactive health communication: a challenge to medicine in the information age. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health.

作者信息

Robinson T N, Patrick K, Eng T R, Gustafson D

机构信息

Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1998 Oct 14;280(14):1264-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.14.1264.

DOI:10.1001/jama.280.14.1264
PMID:9786378
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the current status of interactive health communication (IHC) and propose evidence-based approaches to improve the quality of such applications.

PARTICIPANTS

The Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health, a 14-member, nonfederal panel with expertise in clinical medicine and nursing, public health, media and instructional design, health systems engineering, decision sciences, computer and communication technologies, and health communication, convened by the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, US Department of Health and Human Services.

EVIDENCE

Published studies, online resources, expert panel opinions, and opinions from outside experts in fields related to IHC.

CONSENSUS PROCESS

The panel met 9 times during more than 2 years. Government agencies and private-sector experts provided review and feedback on the panel's work.

CONCLUSIONS

Interactive health communication applications have great potential to improve health, but they may also cause harm. To date, few applications have been adequately evaluated. Physicians and other health professionals should promote and participate in an evidence-based approach to the development and diffusion of IHC applications and endorse efforts to rigorously evaluate the safety, quality, and utility of these resources. A standardized reporting template is proposed to help developers and evaluators of IHC applications conduct evaluations and disclose their results and to help clinicians, purchasers, and consumers judge the quality of IHC applications.

摘要

目的

探讨交互式健康交流(IHC)的现状,并提出基于证据的方法以提高此类应用的质量。

参与者

交互式交流与健康科学小组,这是一个由美国卫生与公众服务部疾病预防与健康促进办公室召集的、由14名成员组成的非联邦小组,成员在临床医学与护理、公共卫生、媒体与教学设计、卫生系统工程、决策科学、计算机与通信技术以及健康交流等领域具备专业知识。

证据

已发表的研究、在线资源、专家小组意见以及来自与IHC相关领域的外部专家的意见。

共识达成过程

该小组在两年多的时间里召开了9次会议。政府机构和私营部门专家对小组的工作进行了审查并提供了反馈。

结论

交互式健康交流应用具有改善健康的巨大潜力,但也可能造成危害。迄今为止,很少有应用得到充分评估。医生和其他卫生专业人员应促进并参与基于证据的方法来开发和推广IHC应用,并支持对这些资源的安全性、质量和效用进行严格评估的努力。提出了一个标准化报告模板,以帮助IHC应用的开发者和评估者进行评估并披露结果,同时帮助临床医生、购买者和消费者判断IHC应用的质量。

相似文献

1
An evidence-based approach to interactive health communication: a challenge to medicine in the information age. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health.基于证据的交互式健康传播方法:信息时代对医学的一项挑战。交互式传播与健康科学小组。
JAMA. 1998 Oct 14;280(14):1264-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.14.1264.
2
Policy issues relevant to evaluation of interactive health communication applications. The Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health.与交互式健康传播应用评估相关的政策问题。交互式传播与健康科学小组。
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jan;16(1):35-42.
3
Developers and evaluation of interactive health communication applications. The Science Panel on Interactive Communications and Health.
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jan;16(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00106-8.
4
Health care providers and purchasers and evaluation of interactive health communication applications. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health.
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jan;16(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00105-6.
5
Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.面向医疗保险人群的远程医疗:儿科、产科及临床医生间接居家干预措施
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001 Aug(24 Suppl):1-32.
6
NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.美国国立卫生研究院关于剖宫产术后阴道分娩的共识发展会议声明草案:新见解
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010 Mar 10;27(3):1-42.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.成本效益分析在健康与医学中的作用。健康与医学成本效益专题小组。
JAMA. 1996 Oct 9;276(14):1172-7.
9
NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on preventing violence and related health-risking social behaviors in adolescents.美国国立卫生研究院关于预防青少年暴力及相关危害健康的社会行为的科学现状会议声明。
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2004;21(2):1-34.
10
Consensus conference. Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Rehabilitation of Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury.共识会议。创伤性脑损伤患者的康复。美国国立卫生研究院创伤性脑损伤患者康复共识发展小组。
JAMA. 1999 Sep 8;282(10):974-83.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality and Misinformation About Health Conditions in Online Peer Support Groups: Scoping Review.在线同伴支持小组中关于健康状况的质量与错误信息:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 16;27:e71140. doi: 10.2196/71140.
2
The moderating role of e-health literacy and patient-physician communication in the relationship between online diabetes information-seeking behavior and self-care practices among individuals with type 2 diabetes.电子健康素养和医患沟通在2型糖尿病患者在线糖尿病信息寻求行为与自我护理实践关系中的调节作用。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Dec 30;25(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02695-9.
3
Understanding Health Self-Management Challenges and Needs for Older Adults with and without Mobility and Sensory Disabilities.
了解有和没有行动及感官障碍的老年人的健康自我管理挑战与需求。
Proc Int Symp Hum Factors Ergon Healthc. 2022;11(1). doi: 10.1177/2327857922111006.
4
Proxy use of patient portals on behalf of children: Federally Qualified Health Centers as a case study.代表儿童使用患者门户网站:以联邦合格健康中心为例进行研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 9;10:20552076231224073. doi: 10.1177/20552076231224073. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
The Effect of Monetary Incentives on Health Care Social Media Content: Study Based on Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.金钱激励对医疗保健社交媒体内容的影响:基于主题建模和情感分析的研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 11;25:e44307. doi: 10.2196/44307.
6
A pilot randomized controlled trial of a lay telephone coaching and web-based intervention for postpartum depression and anxiety: The MPOWER study.一项针对产后抑郁和焦虑的非专业电话辅导及基于网络干预的试点随机对照试验:MPOWER研究。
Internet Interv. 2022 Dec 23;31:100597. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100597. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Evaluation of Web-Based Information.腹腔镜胆囊切除术:基于网络信息的评估
Cureus. 2022 Jan 3;14(1):e20897. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20897. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
The Role of Recipient Characteristics in Health Video Communication Outcomes: Scoping Review.受者特征在健康视频传播效果中的作用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 30;23(12):e30962. doi: 10.2196/30962.
9
Using a Mobile Application for Health Communication to Facilitate a Sense of Coherence: Experiences of Older Persons with Cognitive Impairment.使用健康通讯移动应用程序促进一致性感:认知障碍老年人的体验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 28;18(21):11332. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111332.
10
Online Health Information Seeking by Parents for Their Children: Systematic Review and Agenda for Further Research.家长为子女在线搜索健康信息:系统评价及进一步研究议程。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 25;22(8):e19985. doi: 10.2196/19985.