Schulz S, Zaiss A, Brunner R, Spinner D, Klar R
Department of Medical Informatics, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Methods Inf Med. 1998 Sep;37(3):254-9.
The increasing parallel use of ICD-9 and ICD-10 complicates the comparability of coded diagnoses. This is the reason why we developed a symmetric table for interactive conversion between ICD-9 and ICD-10, based on a vector space text-retrieval method that resulted in unambiguous mapping from ICD-9 to ICD-10 in 64%, from ICD-10 to ICD-9 in 87% of all three- and four-character classes of the tabular list. Out of the remaining 13% of multi-valued relations, a table for automated mapping from ICD-10 to ICD-9 was created. In 9% of cases, the selection offered no problems. A compromise between preserving information content and maintaining the logical integrity had to be found in 2.4%; in 1.6% automated mapping was impossible because of newly defined concepts and structural differences between ICD-9 and ICD-10 that are not counterbalanced by a consistent system of residual categories. We recommend that in a future revision of the ICD, compatibility with the then existing classification system should be considered.
ICD - 9和ICD - 10并行使用的增加使得编码诊断的可比性变得复杂。这就是我们基于向量空间文本检索方法开发了一个用于ICD - 9和ICD - 10之间交互式转换的对称表的原因,该方法在表格列表的所有三位和四位字符类别中,64%的情况能实现从ICD - 9到ICD - 10的明确映射,87%的情况能实现从ICD - 10到ICD - 9的明确映射。在其余13%的多值关系中,创建了一个从ICD - 10到ICD - 9的自动映射表。在9%的情况下,选择不存在问题。在2.4%的情况下,必须在保留信息内容和保持逻辑完整性之间找到折衷方案;在1.6%的情况下,由于ICD - 9和ICD - 10之间新定义的概念和结构差异,且没有一致的残余类别系统来平衡,自动映射是不可能的。我们建议在ICD的未来修订中,应考虑与当时现有的分类系统的兼容性。