Fraass B, Doppke K, Hunt M, Kutcher G, Starkschall G, Stern R, Van Dyke J
University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, USA.
Med Phys. 1998 Oct;25(10):1773-829. doi: 10.1118/1.598373.
In recent years, the sophistication and complexity of clinical treatment planning and treatment planning systems has increased significantly, particularly including three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning systems, and the use of conformal treatment planning and delivery techniques. This has led to the need for a comprehensive set of quality assurance (QA) guidelines that can be applied to clinical treatment planning. This document is the report of Task Group 53 of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The purpose of this report is to guide and assist the clinical medical physicist in developing and implementing a comprehensive but viable program of quality assurance for modern radiotherapy treatment planning. The scope of the QA needs for treatment planning is quite broad, encompassing image-based definition of patient anatomy, 3D beam descriptions for complex beams including multileaf collimator apertures, 3D dose calculation algorithms, and complex plan evaluation tools including dose volume histograms. The Task Group recommends an organizational framework for the task of creating a QA program which is individualized to the needs of each institution and addresses the issues of acceptance testing, commissioning the planning system and planning process, routine quality assurance, and ongoing QA of the planning process. This report, while not prescribing specific QA tests, provides the framework and guidance to allow radiation oncology physicists to design comprehensive and practical treatment planning QA programs for their clinics.
近年来,临床治疗计划和治疗计划系统的复杂性和 sophistication 显著增加,特别是包括三维(3D)治疗计划系统以及适形治疗计划和交付技术的使用。这导致需要一套全面的质量保证(QA)指南,可应用于临床治疗计划。本文件是美国医学物理学家协会放射治疗委员会任务组 53 的报告。本报告的目的是指导和协助临床医疗物理学家制定和实施一个全面但可行的现代放射治疗治疗计划质量保证计划。治疗计划的 QA 需求范围相当广泛,涵盖基于图像的患者解剖结构定义、用于复杂射束(包括多叶准直器孔径)的 3D 射束描述、3D 剂量计算算法以及包括剂量体积直方图在内的复杂计划评估工具。任务组推荐了一个用于创建 QA 计划任务的组织框架,该框架针对每个机构的需求进行个性化定制,并解决验收测试、规划系统和规划过程的调试、常规质量保证以及规划过程的持续 QA 等问题。本报告虽然未规定具体的 QA 测试,但提供了框架和指导,使放射肿瘤物理学家能够为其诊所设计全面且实用的治疗计划 QA 计划。