Ashok P W, Penney G C, Flett G M, Templeton A
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, UK.
Hum Reprod. 1998 Oct;13(1O):2962-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.10.2962.
A combination of the anti-progesterone mifepristone and gemeprost provides an effective non-surgical method for the induction of abortion at gestations up to 63 days, achieving complete abortion rates of over 95%. We report our experience with an alternate regimen, comprising a reduced dose of mifepristone in combination with vaginal misoprostol. A consecutive series of 2000 women requesting early medical abortion at gestations up to 63 days was studied retrospectively. Each woman received mifepristone 200 mg orally, followed 36-48 h later by misoprostol 800 microg vaginally. Of the 2000 women, 39 (2.0%) aborted completely following administration of mifepristone alone and a further 1912 experienced complete abortion following administration of misoprostol (a complete abortion rate of 97.5%). Surgical intervention was required in 49 women (2.5%): for incomplete abortion in 27 (1.4%), for missed abortion in seven (0.4%), for continuing pregnancy in 11 (0.6%) and to exclude ectopic pregnancy in four (0.2%). The surgical intervention rate was significantly higher among women at gestations > or = 49 days than among those at < or = 49 days (3.3 versus 1.5%, P = 0.0193). The regimen appears as effective, in terms of high complete abortion rate and low continuing pregnancy rate, as any published alternative. This regimen has the benefit of being less costly as the dose of mifepristone is 67% lower and misoprostol is substantially less expensive than gemeprost. Additionally, misoprostol does not require special transport or storage requirements. As such, the combination of mifepristone and misoprostol may be preferable to mifepristone and gemeprost.
抗孕激素米非司酮与吉美前列素联合使用,为孕期63天内的引产提供了一种有效的非手术方法,完全流产率超过95%。我们报告了我们使用另一种方案的经验,该方案包括减少剂量的米非司酮与阴道用米索前列醇联合使用。对连续2000名要求在孕期63天内进行早期药物流产的妇女进行了回顾性研究。每位妇女口服200mg米非司酮,36 - 48小时后阴道给予800μg米索前列醇。在这2000名妇女中,39名(2.0%)仅服用米非司酮后完全流产,另外1912名在服用米索前列醇后完全流产(完全流产率为97.5%)。49名妇女(2.5%)需要手术干预:27名(1.4%)因流产不全,7名(0.4%)因稽留流产,11名(0.6%)因持续妊娠,4名(0.2%)因排除异位妊娠。孕周≥49天的妇女手术干预率显著高于孕周≤49天的妇女(3.3%对1.5%,P = 0.0193)。就高完全流产率和低持续妊娠率而言,该方案似乎与任何已发表的替代方案一样有效。该方案的优点是成本较低,因为米非司酮的剂量降低了67%,且米索前列醇比吉美前列素便宜得多。此外,米索前列醇不需要特殊的运输或储存条件。因此,米非司酮与米索前列醇联合使用可能比米非司酮与吉美前列素更可取。