Odds ratios should be avoided when events are common.
作者信息
Altman D G, Deeks J J, Sackett D L
出版信息
BMJ. 1998 Nov 7;317(7168):1318. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1318.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Odds ratios should be avoided when events are common.当事件很常见时，应避免使用比值比。
BMJ. 1998 Nov 7;317(7168):1318. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1318.
2
ILSI and the tobacco industry. International Life Sciences Institute.国际生命科学学会与烟草行业。国际生命科学学会。
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):891-2; author reply 892-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.6.891-a.
3
Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.在一项由烟草行业资助的婴儿猝死综合征评估中，关于二手烟的结论突然改变。
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e356-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1922.
4
Heat-not-Burn Tobacco Products: Tobacco Industry Claims No Substitute for Science.加热不燃烧烟草制品：烟草行业的说法无法替代科学。
Pediatrics. 2018 Jan;141(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2383. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
5
How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke.烟草行业如何应对一项关于二手烟健康影响的有影响力的研究。
BMJ. 2002 Dec 14;325(7377):1413-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7377.1413.
6
Links with the tobacco industry.
Lancet. 2005;365(9455):211; author reply 211-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17730-7.
7
Passive smoking: tobacco industry publishes disinformation.被动吸烟：烟草行业发布虚假信息。
BMJ. 2003 Aug 30;327(7413):502-3; author reply 504-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7413.502-c.
8
Resisting smoke and spin.抵制烟雾和歪曲。
Lancet. 2000 Apr 8;355(9211):1197.
9
Setting the tobacco record straight?
Lancet. 2000 Jul 22;356(9226):336-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)73616-3.
10
Smoker misperceptions around tobacco: national survey data of particular relevance to protecting Maori health.
N Z Med J. 2009 Nov 20;122(1306):123-7.
引用本文的文献
1
Efficacy and safety of the Shugan Jieyu capsule as a complementary treatment for functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.舒肝解郁胶囊作为功能性消化不良辅助治疗的疗效和安全性：一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 29;104(35):e44058. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044058.
2
THE ODDS RATIO: A MEASURE OF STRENGTH IN CLINICAL RESEARCH AND AN ANTITHESIS TO ODDS IN GAMBLING.比值比：临床研究中的一种强度测量指标，也是赌博中赔率的对立概念。
Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2025 Mar 31;23(1):134-136.
3
Risk of Instrumental Delivery in Maternal Obesity: Estimates With Measures of Effect Size.孕产妇肥胖情况下器械助产的风险：效应量测量的估计值
Ochsner J. 2024 Fall;24(3):192-197. doi: 10.31486/toj.24.0041.
4
Five-minute Apgar score and risk of neonatal mortality, severe neurological morbidity and severe non-neurological morbidity in term infants - an Australian population-based cohort study.足月儿的5分钟阿氏评分与新生儿死亡率、严重神经疾病发病率及严重非神经疾病发病率的风险——一项基于澳大利亚人群的队列研究
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Jan 13;44:101011. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101011. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Physical Activity Behavior and Its Association With Global Cognitive Function Three Months After Stroke: The Nor-COAST Study†.体力活动行为及其与卒中后三个月全球认知功能的关系：NOR-COAST 研究。
Phys Ther. 2023 Dec 6;103(12). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad092.
6
artcat: Sample-size calculation for an ordered categorical outcome.艺术猫：有序分类结局的样本量计算。
Stata J. 2023 Mar;23(1):3-23. doi: 10.1177/1536867X231161934. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
7
U.S. Population Data on Hearing Loss, Trouble Hearing, and Hearing-Device Use in Adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-12, 2015-16, and 2017-20.美国成年人听力损失、听力障碍和使用助听设备的数据：2011-2012 年、2015-2016 年和 2017-2018 年全国健康和营养调查。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231160978. doi: 10.1177/23312165231160978.
8
Reflection on modern methods: risk ratio regression-simple concept yet complex computation.关于现代方法的思考：风险比回归——简单的概念，却有着复杂的计算。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 8;52(1):309-314. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac220.
9
Commentary: The Long History of Vitamin C: From Prevention of the Common Cold to Potential Aid in the Treatment of COVID-19.评论：维生素C的漫长历史：从预防普通感冒到可能助力治疗新冠病毒肺炎
Front Immunol. 2021 Apr 1;12:659001. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.659001. eCollection 2021.
10
Unsafe Injection Is Associated with Higher HIV Testing after Bayesian Adjustment for Unmeasured Confounding.不安全注射与贝叶斯调整后未测量混杂因素的更高 HIV 检测率相关。
Arch Iran Med. 2020 Dec 1;23(12):848-855. doi: 10.34172/aim.2020.113.
本文引用的文献
1
When can odds ratios mislead? Odds ratios should be used only in case-control studies and logistic regression analyses.比值比在何时会产生误导？比值比仅应在病例对照研究和逻辑回归分析中使用。
BMJ. 1998 Oct 24;317(7166):1155-6; author reply 1156-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7166.1155a.
2
Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions.为何关于被动吸烟对健康影响的综述文章会得出不同结论。
JAMA. 1998 May 20;279(19):1566-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.19.1566.
Zotero 插件