• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恶性胸膜间皮瘤

Malignant pleural mesothelioma.

作者信息

Boutin C, Schlesser M, Frenay C, Astoul P

机构信息

Dept of Pulmonary Diseases, Hôpital de La Conception, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1998 Oct;12(4):972-81. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.12040972.

DOI:10.1183/09031936.98.12040972
PMID:9817178
Abstract

The incidence of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has risen for some decades and is expected to peak between 2010 and 2020. Up to now, no single treatment has been proven to be effective and death usually occurs within about 12-17 months after diagnosis. Perhaps because of this poor prognosis, early screening has incited little interest. However, certain forms may have a better prognosis when diagnosed early and treated by multimodal therapy or intrapleural immunotherapy. Diagnosis depends foremost on histological analysis of samples obtained by thoracoscopy. This procedure allows the best staging of the pleural cavity with an attempt to detect visceral pleural involvement, which is one of the most important prognostic factors. Although radiotherapy seems necessary and is efficient in preventing the malignant seeding after diagnostic procedures in patients, there has been no randomized phase III study showing the superiority of any treatment compared with another. However, for the early-stage disease (stage I) a logical therapeutic approach seems to be neoadjuvant intrapleural treatment using cytokines. For more advanced disease (stages II and III) resectability should be discussed with the thoracic surgeons and a multimodal treatment combining surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy should be proposed for a randomized controlled study. Palliative treatment is indicated for stage IV. In any case, each patient should be enrolled in a clinical trial.

摘要

恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)的发病率在过去几十年中呈上升趋势,预计在2010年至2020年之间达到峰值。到目前为止,尚无单一治疗方法被证明有效,患者通常在诊断后约12 - 17个月内死亡。也许正是由于这种不良预后,早期筛查并未引起太多关注。然而,某些类型在早期诊断并接受多模式治疗或胸膜内免疫治疗时,预后可能会更好。诊断主要依赖于通过胸腔镜获取的样本进行组织学分析。该操作能够对胸腔进行最佳分期,以试图检测脏层胸膜受累情况,这是最重要的预后因素之一。尽管放疗似乎是必要的,且在预防患者诊断性操作后的恶性播散方面有效,但尚无随机III期研究表明任何一种治疗方法优于其他方法。然而,对于早期疾病(I期),一种合理的治疗方法似乎是使用细胞因子进行新辅助胸膜内治疗。对于更晚期的疾病(II期和III期),应与胸外科医生讨论可切除性,并应提出将手术、放疗和化疗相结合的多模式治疗方案,用于随机对照研究。IV期患者则需进行姑息治疗。无论如何,每位患者都应参加临床试验。

相似文献

1
Malignant pleural mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤
Eur Respir J. 1998 Oct;12(4):972-81. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.12040972.
2
[Malignant pleural mesothelioma].
Minerva Chir. 2001 Dec;56(6):611-41.
3
Pleural mesothelioma.胸膜间皮瘤
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 1999 Jul;5(4):259-68. doi: 10.1097/00063198-199907000-00015.
4
[Malignant pleural mesothelioma: diagnosis and treatment].[恶性胸膜间皮瘤:诊断与治疗]
Rev Pneumol Clin. 2013 Feb;69(1):26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pneumo.2012.12.003. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
5
[Malignant pleural mesothelioma].[恶性胸膜间皮瘤]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2018 Apr 9;180(15).
6
Malignant pleural mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤
Cancer Treat Res. 2001;105:327-73. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1589-0_13.
7
Malignant pleural mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤
Am J Med Sci. 2005 Jan;329(1):29-44. doi: 10.1097/00000441-200501000-00007.
8
Clinical features and current treatment of diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma.弥漫性恶性胸膜间皮瘤的临床特征与当前治疗方法
Lung Cancer. 1995 Jun;12 Suppl 2:S127-46. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(10)80011-x.
9
[Current insights in malignant pleural mesothelioma].[恶性胸膜间皮瘤的当前见解]
Bull Cancer. 2002 Jan;89(1):67-74.
10
[Surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma].[恶性胸膜间皮瘤的外科治疗]
Rev Pneumol Clin. 2004 Apr;60(2):68-72. doi: 10.1016/s0761-8417(04)73472-0.

引用本文的文献

1
FGF2 promotes the expansion of parietal mesothelial progenitor pools and inhibits BMP4-mediated smooth muscle cell differentiation.成纤维细胞生长因子2促进壁层间皮祖细胞库的扩增,并抑制骨形态发生蛋白4介导的平滑肌细胞分化。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 Sep 23;12:1387237. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1387237. eCollection 2024.
2
Pleural mesothelioma (PMe): The evolving molecular knowledge of a rare and aggressive cancer.胸膜间皮瘤(PMe):一种罕见且侵袭性癌症的不断发展的分子知识。
Mol Oncol. 2024 Apr;18(4):797-814. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13591. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
3
Recent Advances of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition and Potential for (Combined) TIGIT Blockade as a New Strategy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.
免疫检查点抑制的最新进展以及(联合)阻断TIGIT作为恶性胸膜间皮瘤新策略的潜力
Biomedicines. 2022 Mar 14;10(3):673. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10030673.
4
Malignant mesothelioma metastatic to the oral region and latest topics (Review).转移至口腔区域的恶性间皮瘤及最新研究课题(综述)
Mol Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov;13(5):61. doi: 10.3892/mco.2020.2131. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
Racial Disparities in Treatment Patterns and Survival Among Surgically Treated Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Patients.手术治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者的治疗模式和生存中的种族差异。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2020 Dec;22(6):1163-1171. doi: 10.1007/s10903-020-01038-x.
6
Intramedullary Metastasis to the Cervical Spinal Cord from Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Review of the Literature and Case Reports.恶性胸膜间皮瘤脊髓内转移至颈髓:文献综述与病例报告
Asian J Neurosurg. 2020 Feb 25;15(1):70-75. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_234_18. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
7
LOX family and ZFPM2 as novel diagnostic biomarkers for malignant pleural mesothelioma.LOX家族和ZFPM2作为恶性胸膜间皮瘤的新型诊断生物标志物。
Biomark Res. 2020 Jan 8;8:1. doi: 10.1186/s40364-019-0180-0. eCollection 2020.
8
Building a Bridge between Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Investigating the Effect of Chemotherapy on Immune Checkpoint Expression.在恶性胸膜间皮瘤中建立化疗与免疫治疗的桥梁:研究化疗对免疫检查点表达的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 26;20(17):4182. doi: 10.3390/ijms20174182.
9
Antitumor efficacy of Kisspeptin in human malignant mesothelioma cells.亲吻素在人恶性间皮瘤细胞中的抗肿瘤疗效。
Oncotarget. 2018 Apr 10;9(27):19273-19282. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25018.
10
Endoscopic diagnosis and management of pleural effusion in malignant pleural mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤中胸腔积液的内镜诊断与处理
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jan;10(Suppl 2):S269-S275. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.09.142.