Suppr超能文献

美国陆军旋翼机飞行操作中的空间定向障碍

Spatial disorientation in U.S. Army rotary-wing operations.

作者信息

Braithwaite M G, Durnford S J, Crowley J S, Rosado N R, Albano J P

机构信息

U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, Fort Rucker, AL, USA.

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 1998 Nov;69(11):1031-7.

PMID:9819157
Abstract

This paper describes two surveys concerning spatial disorientation (SD) in U.S. Army rotary-wing operations that sought to assess the hazard and to identify recommendations to control it. One survey was of accident records, and the other was of aircrew experiences. Both surveys highlighted the magnitude of the problem. The accident survey showed that 30% of class A to C accidents involved SD as a significant factor, while the aircrew survey showed that 78% of aircrews have been disoriented (8% to the extent that flight safety was threatened). Both surveys showed a significant increase in SD associated with combat operations. Several differences between the two surveys were noted: 90% of the reviewed accidents were thought to involve type I (unrecognized) SD compared with only 43% of the reported incidents; both pilots in a particular aircraft were considered to have been disoriented in at least 59% of accidents compared with 23% of incidents; sudden loss of visual cues ("brownout," "whiteout," or inadvertent entry to instrument meteorological conditions) accounted for 25% of SD accidents compared with 13% of incidents; and 62% of the accidents occurred at night compared with only 36% of incidents. Neither survey showed any association between SD and fatigue or other human factors. The results of both surveys suggested that crew coordination, alerting devices (e.g., audio warnings on the radar altimeter), flight information displays, and autopilot functions would be good targets for improvement.

摘要

本文描述了两项关于美国陆军旋翼机操作中空间定向障碍(SD)的调查,旨在评估其危害并确定控制措施建议。一项调查是关于事故记录,另一项是关于机组人员的经历。两项调查都凸显了该问题的严重性。事故调查显示,30%的A类至C类事故涉及空间定向障碍作为一个重要因素,而机组人员调查显示,78%的机组人员曾经历过定向障碍(8%的程度达到威胁飞行安全)。两项调查都表明,与作战行动相关的空间定向障碍显著增加。注意到两项调查之间的几个差异:在审查的事故中,90%被认为涉及I型(未被识别的)空间定向障碍,而在报告的事件中这一比例仅为43%;在特定飞机上,至少59%的事故中两名飞行员都被认为出现了定向障碍,而在事件中这一比例为23%;视觉线索突然丧失(“棕色out”、“白色out”或意外进入仪表气象条件)占空间定向障碍事故的25%,而在事件中占13%;62%的事故发生在夜间,而在事件中仅为36%。两项调查均未显示空间定向障碍与疲劳或其他人为因素之间存在任何关联。两项调查结果均表明,机组人员协调、警报装置(如雷达高度计上的音频警告)、飞行信息显示和自动驾驶功能将是改进的良好目标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验