Wiener J
J Anal Psychol. 1998 Oct;43(4):493-508. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00049.
This paper seeks to illustrate the ambiguity of the affect of 'anger' which masks a number of subtly different emotions observable in clinical work. The author differentiates between anger, rage and hatred in terms of the dialectical relationship between ego and self and pays particular attention to why it is that for some patients, experiences of anger may be harnessed creatively into development, whereas for others, they remain self destructive. Using illustrations from work with two patients in analysis, the author describes how a persistent grievance originating in the earliest stages of life is linked with hatred and can lead to a defensive self structure. It is suggested that the clues to the presence of a grievance and to its potential transformation are likely to be observable first in the analyst's countertransference in the form of an all-embracing emotional strait jacket. Analysts' capacity to tolerate their own hatred is crucial to the transformation of a patient's grievance.
本文旨在阐明“愤怒”情感的模糊性，这种模糊性掩盖了临床工作中可观察到的一些细微不同的情绪。作者从自我与本我的辩证关系方面区分了愤怒、暴怒和仇恨，并特别关注为何对一些患者而言，愤怒体验可被创造性地用于成长，而对另一些患者来说，愤怒体验却依然具有自我毁灭性。作者通过对两位接受精神分析治疗的患者的案例分析，描述了源于生命最初阶段的持续不满是如何与仇恨相联系，并可能导致一种防御性的自我结构。有人提出，不满情绪存在及其潜在转变的线索，很可能首先以一种无所不包的情感束缚形式在分析师的反移情中被观察到。分析师容忍自身仇恨的能力对于患者不满情绪的转变至关重要。
