Lane S D, Clow J K, Innis A, Critchfield T S
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences 77030, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Nov;70(3):267-79. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-267.
This study employed a stimulus-class rating procedure to explore whether stimulus equivalence and stimulus generalization can combine to promote the formation of open-ended categories incorporating cross-modal stimuli. A pretest of simple auditory discrimination indicated that subjects (college students) could discriminate among a range of tones used in the main study. Before beginning the main study, 10 subjects learned to use a rating procedure for categorizing sets of stimuli as class consistent or class inconsistent. After completing conditional discrimination training with new stimuli (shapes and tones), the subjects demonstrated the formation of cross-modal equivalence classes. Subsequently, the class-inclusion rating procedure was reinstituted, this time with cross-modal sets of stimuli drawn from the equivalence classes. On some occasions, the tones of the equivalence classes were replaced by novel tones. The probability that these novel sets would be rated as class consistent was generally a function of the auditory distance between the novel tone and the tone that was explicitly included in the equivalence class. These data extend prior work on generalization of equivalence classes, and support the role of operant processes in human category formation.
本研究采用刺激类别评定程序,以探究刺激等价性和刺激泛化是否能够结合起来,促进包含跨模态刺激的开放式类别的形成。一项简单听觉辨别预测试表明,受试者(大学生)能够区分主要研究中使用的一系列音调。在开始主要研究之前,10名受试者学习使用一种评定程序,将刺激集分类为类别一致或类别不一致。在用新刺激(形状和音调)完成条件辨别训练后,受试者表现出跨模态等价类的形成。随后,重新采用类别包含评定程序,这次使用从等价类中抽取的跨模态刺激集。在某些情况下,等价类的音调被新音调取代。这些新刺激集被评定为类别一致的概率通常是新音调和等价类中明确包含的音调之间听觉距离的函数。这些数据扩展了先前关于等价类泛化的研究,并支持了操作性过程在人类类别形成中的作用。