• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

这关乎谁的健康?感染艾滋病毒的注射吸毒者及其专业护理人员的观点。

Whose health is it? The views of injecting drug users with HIV infection and their professional carers.

作者信息

Carretero M D, Chiswick A, Catalan J

机构信息

Neurosciences and Psychological Medicine Division, Imperial College School of Medicine, Psychological Medicine Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

AIDS Care. 1998 Jun;10(3):323-8. doi: 10.1080/713612414.

DOI:10.1080/713612414
PMID:9828975
Abstract

The views about autonomy in medical treatment of people with HIV infection (who had acquired it via the injection of drugs) and their professional carers were investigated using a standardized self-report instrument. Forty-two patients and 61 staff were entered in the study. Patients and staff reported strong endorsement of patient autonomy, but there were important differences between groups. Staff as a group reported higher preference for patients' involvement in decision-making than the patients themselves, while the opposite was true for information-seeking, where patients wanted more information than staff had anticipated. The practical implications of the findings are discussed.

摘要

使用标准化的自我报告工具,对感染艾滋病毒(通过注射毒品感染)的患者及其专业护理人员在医疗自主权方面的观点进行了调查。42名患者和61名工作人员参与了该研究。患者和工作人员都强烈支持患者自主权,但两组之间存在重要差异。总体而言,工作人员比患者自己更倾向于让患者参与决策,而在信息寻求方面则相反,患者想要的信息比工作人员预期的更多。文中讨论了这些研究结果的实际意义。

相似文献

1
Whose health is it? The views of injecting drug users with HIV infection and their professional carers.这关乎谁的健康?感染艾滋病毒的注射吸毒者及其专业护理人员的观点。
AIDS Care. 1998 Jun;10(3):323-8. doi: 10.1080/713612414.
2
Whose health is it? Views about decision-making and information-seeking from people with HIV infection and their professional carers.这关乎谁的健康?关于艾滋病毒感染者及其专业护理人员决策和信息获取的观点。
AIDS Care. 1994;6(3):349-56. doi: 10.1080/09540129408258647.
3
Managing HIV. Part 7: Professional issues. 7.3 What do people with HIV, their carers and families want of their medical carers?
Med J Aust. 1996 Jul 15;165(2):92-3.
4
Home percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding: perceptions of patients, carers, nurses and dietitians.家庭经皮内镜下胃造口术喂养:患者、护理人员、护士和营养师的看法。
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Aug;59(4):388-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04307.x. Epub 2007 May 25.
5
The medical practice of patient autonomy and cancer treatment refusals: a patients' and physicians' perspective.患者自主权与癌症治疗拒绝的医疗实践:患者与医生的视角
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(11):2325-36. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.027.
6
Information disclosure and decision-making: the Middle East versus the Far East and the West.信息披露与决策:中东地区与远东及西方的比较
J Med Ethics. 2008 Apr;34(4):225-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019638.
7
Sources of evidence in HIV/AIDS care: pilot study comparing family physicians and AIDS service organization staff.艾滋病护理中的证据来源:比较家庭医生和艾滋病服务组织工作人员的试点研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Jul 9;4(1):18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-18.
8
HIV/AIDS patient involvement in antiretroviral treatment decisions.艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者参与抗逆转录病毒治疗决策。
AIDS Care. 2002 Feb;14(1):17-26. doi: 10.1080/09540120220097900.
9
Support for self-management of cardiovascular disease by people with learning disabilities.学习障碍者对心血管疾病的自我管理支持。
Fam Pract. 2012 Aug;29(4):467-75. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr106. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
10
The decision to forgo antiretroviral therapy in people living with HIV compliance as paternalism or partnership?在艾滋病毒感染者中放弃抗逆转录病毒治疗的决定:是家长式做法还是伙伴关系?
Eur J Med Res. 2004 Feb 27;9(2):61-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.患者对共同决策的偏好:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
2
Keeping joint medical and nursing notes at foot of bed. What about confidentiality if notes can be accessed by anybody?将联合医疗和护理记录放在床尾。如果任何人都能查看这些记录,那如何保证隐私呢?
BMJ. 2000 Mar 4;320(7235):646-7.
3
Changing prescribing in the light of tolerability concerns: how is this best achieved?鉴于耐受性问题而改变处方:如何才能最好地实现这一点?
Drug Saf. 1999 Sep;21(3):153-60. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199921030-00001.