• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

这关乎谁的健康?关于艾滋病毒感染者及其专业护理人员决策和信息获取的观点。

Whose health is it? Views about decision-making and information-seeking from people with HIV infection and their professional carers.

作者信息

Catalan J, Brener N, Andrews H, Day A, Cullum S, Hooker M, Gazzard B

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, London, UK.

出版信息

AIDS Care. 1994;6(3):349-56. doi: 10.1080/09540129408258647.

DOI:10.1080/09540129408258647
PMID:7948091
Abstract

The views of people with HIV and their professional carers about patients' views on involvement in decision-making and information-seeking were studied, using a standardized self-report instrument. Patients and staff reported high levels of desire for patients' involvement in their care, but there were important differences between groups. Staff had higher preference for patients' involvement in decision-making than the patients themselves, while the opposite was the case for information-seeking. There were differences between professional groups and symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, social workers generally reporting higher preference for patients' autonomy, while doctors reported lower levels. Symptomatic patients tended to have lower preference for autonomy than asymptomatic ones. The significance and practical implications of the findings are discussed.

摘要

使用标准化的自我报告工具,研究了艾滋病毒感染者及其专业护理人员对患者参与决策和寻求信息的看法。患者和工作人员都表示非常希望患者参与自身护理,但不同群体之间存在重要差异。工作人员比患者本人更倾向于让患者参与决策,而在寻求信息方面则相反。不同专业群体以及有症状和无症状患者之间存在差异,社会工作者总体上对患者自主权的偏好更高,而医生的偏好较低。有症状的患者对自主权的偏好往往低于无症状患者。讨论了研究结果的意义和实际影响。

相似文献

1
Whose health is it? Views about decision-making and information-seeking from people with HIV infection and their professional carers.这关乎谁的健康?关于艾滋病毒感染者及其专业护理人员决策和信息获取的观点。
AIDS Care. 1994;6(3):349-56. doi: 10.1080/09540129408258647.
2
Whose health is it? The views of injecting drug users with HIV infection and their professional carers.这关乎谁的健康?感染艾滋病毒的注射吸毒者及其专业护理人员的观点。
AIDS Care. 1998 Jun;10(3):323-8. doi: 10.1080/713612414.
3
The decision to forgo antiretroviral therapy in people living with HIV compliance as paternalism or partnership?在艾滋病毒感染者中放弃抗逆转录病毒治疗的决定:是家长式做法还是伙伴关系?
Eur J Med Res. 2004 Feb 27;9(2):61-70.
4
Information disclosure and decision-making: the Middle East versus the Far East and the West.信息披露与决策:中东地区与远东及西方的比较
J Med Ethics. 2008 Apr;34(4):225-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019638.
5
Preferences for medical collaboration: patient-physician congruence and patient outcomes.医疗协作偏好:医患一致性与患者治疗结果
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.006.
6
Preferences for shared decision making in chronic pain patients compared with patients during a premedication visit.慢性疼痛患者与术前访视患者在共同决策方面的偏好比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Sep;50(8):1019-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01097.x.
7
HIV/AIDS patient involvement in antiretroviral treatment decisions.艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者参与抗逆转录病毒治疗决策。
AIDS Care. 2002 Feb;14(1):17-26. doi: 10.1080/09540120220097900.
8
Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family's role in medical decision-making.关系自主性还是不当压力?家庭在医疗决策中的作用。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Mar;22(1):128-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00561.x.
9
Clinical decision making and the provision of information in PEG feeding: an exploration of patients and their carers' perceptions.经皮内镜下胃造口术喂养中的临床决策与信息提供:患者及其护理人员认知的探索
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2009 Aug;22(4):302-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2009.00966.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
10
Information-seeking and decision-making preferences among adult orthodontic patients: an elective health care model.成人正畸患者的信息寻求和决策偏好:一种选择性医疗保健模式。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;39(1):79-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00572.x. Epub 2010 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Ugandan Study Participants Experience Electronic Monitoring of Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence as Welcomed Pressure to Adhere.乌干达研究参与者体验到电子监测抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性作为受欢迎的坚持压力。
AIDS Behav. 2018 Oct;22(10):3363-3372. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2200-8.
2
Patient autonomy and informed consent--individual preferences of senior study participants in Germany.患者自主性和知情同意——德国高龄研究参与者的个体偏好。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012 Jun;124(11-12):384-90. doi: 10.1007/s00508-012-0187-0. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
3
Surrogate decision-making in Korean patients with advanced cancer: a longitudinal study.
晚期癌症韩国患者的替代决策:一项纵向研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jan;21(1):183-90. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1509-5. Epub 2012 May 31.
4
Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.患者对共同决策的偏好:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
5
Decision-making role preferences among patients with HIV: associations with patient and provider characteristics and communication behaviors.HIV患者的决策角色偏好:与患者及医疗服务提供者特征和沟通行为的关联
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun;25(6):517-23. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1275-3. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
6
Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.慢性病青少年及其父母对治疗决策的看法:一项试点研究。
Health Expect. 2008 Dec;11(4):343-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00508.x.
7
Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement?患者参与患者安全:哪些因素会影响患者的参与和投入?
Health Expect. 2007 Sep;10(3):259-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00450.x.
8
Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences.并非所有患者都希望参与决策制定。一项关于公众偏好的全国性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jun;20(6):531-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x.
9
Medical tests: women's reported and preferred decision-making roles and preferences for information on benefits, side-effects and false results.医学检查:女性报告的以及偏好的决策角色,以及对有关益处、副作用和错误结果信息的偏好。
Health Expect. 2002 Dec;5(4):330-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00194.x.
10
Openness with patients: a categorical imperative to correct an imbalance.对患者保持开放:纠正失衡的绝对必要之事。
Sci Eng Ethics. 1997 Jul;3(3):297-304. doi: 10.1007/s11948-997-0036-0.