• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于枯草芽孢杆菌BGA抑制作用的抗生素残留筛选试验的实验设计优化

Optimization of an antibiotic residue screening test, based on inhibition of Bacillus subtilis BGA, with experimental design.

作者信息

Koenen-Dierick K, De Beer J O

机构信息

Ministry of Public Health, Scientific Institute of Public Health-Louis Pasteur, Department of Pharmacobromatology, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Food Addit Contam. 1998 Jul;15(5):528-34. doi: 10.1080/02652039809374677.

DOI:10.1080/02652039809374677
PMID:9829036
Abstract

Experimental design was applied to an agar-diffusion inhibition test for the screening of residues of veterinary antimicrobial drugs in slaughter animals. The effects and interactions of four independent parameters were studied: the dextrose content of the culture medium, the trimethoprim concentration in the culture medium, the thickness of the agar-layer and the preincubation time. The effects on the inhibition zones of sulphadimidine, oxytetracycline, streptomycin and tylosin, substances of four different antibiotic groups were measured. An optimized multi-residue test was established with the parameter values that yielded the best sensitivity for the four substances.

摘要

实验设计应用于琼脂扩散抑制试验,用于筛选屠宰动物中兽药抗菌药物残留。研究了四个独立参数的影响及相互作用:培养基中的葡萄糖含量、培养基中的甲氧苄啶浓度、琼脂层厚度和预孵育时间。测定了四种不同抗生素组的物质磺胺二甲嘧啶、土霉素、链霉素和泰乐菌素对抑菌圈的影响。利用对这四种物质产生最佳灵敏度的参数值建立了优化的多残留检测方法。

相似文献

1
Optimization of an antibiotic residue screening test, based on inhibition of Bacillus subtilis BGA, with experimental design.基于枯草芽孢杆菌BGA抑制作用的抗生素残留筛选试验的实验设计优化
Food Addit Contam. 1998 Jul;15(5):528-34. doi: 10.1080/02652039809374677.
2
A one-plate microbiological screening test for antibiotic residue testing in kidney tissue and meat: an alternative to the EEC four-plate method?一种用于肾脏组织和肉类抗生素残留检测的单平板微生物筛选试验:欧洲经济共同体四平板法的替代方法?
Food Addit Contam. 1995 Jan-Feb;12(1):77-82. doi: 10.1080/02652039509374281.
3
Evaluation of three different microbial inhibition tests for the detection of sulphamethazine residues in the edible tissues of rabbit.评价三种不同的微生物抑制试验检测兔食用组织中磺胺嘧啶残留。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2009 Jul;26(7):978-87. doi: 10.1080/02652030902839715.
4
Inhibition tests for detection and presumptive identification of tetracyclines, beta-lactam antibiotics and quinolones in poultry meat.用于检测和初步鉴定禽肉中四环素类、β-内酰胺类抗生素和喹诺酮类抗生素的抑制试验。
Food Addit Contam. 2001 May;18(5):385-93. doi: 10.1080/02652030120410.
5
Bioactivity-based screening methods for antibiotics residues: a comparative study of commercial and in-house developed kits.基于生物活性的抗生素残留筛选方法:商业试剂盒和内部开发试剂盒的比较研究。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2012;29(4):577-86. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2011.641508. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
6
Microbiological detection of 10 quinolone antibiotic residues and its application to artificially contaminated poultry samples.10种喹诺酮类抗生素残留的微生物学检测及其在人工污染家禽样本中的应用
Food Addit Contam. 2007 Mar;24(3):252-7. doi: 10.1080/02652030600988020.
7
Combined Plate Microbial Assay (CPMA): a 6-plate-method for simultaneous first and second level screening of antibacterial residues in meat.组合平板微生物检测法(CPMA):一种用于肉类中抗菌残留一级和二级同步筛选的六平板法。
Food Addit Contam. 2006 Jan;23(1):16-24. doi: 10.1080/02652030500307131.
8
[Determination of antibiotic chemicals using microbiological tests: evaluation of the limits of sensitivity].[使用微生物学检测法测定抗生素化学物质:灵敏度限度评估]
Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1991 Jun;67(6):561-8.
9
Evaluation of a modified EC Four Plate Method to detect antimicrobial drugs.评估一种改良的EC四板法检测抗菌药物。
Food Addit Contam. 1998 Aug-Sep;15(6):651-60. doi: 10.1080/02652039809374694.
10
Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food.食品中某些兽药残留的评估。
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2002;911:i-vi, 1-66, back cover.