Furukawa K K, Niagro F D, Runyan D A, Cameron S M
US Army Dental Activity, West Point, NY, USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Dec;80(6):723-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70061-7.
Soft tissue denture liners frequently require replacement that necessitates complete removal from the denture base. A high speed lathe located in a "clean laboratory" is often used to facilitate removal of these materials, but it is unclear whether routine disinfection procedures reduce bacterial contamination sufficiently to prevent contamination of the laboratory.
The first phase of this study evaluated the effectiveness of 3-minute chlorine dioxide spray and immersion disinfection procedures on 2 denture liners (Coe Soft and Coe Comfort) and stainless steel specimens used as controls. The second phase evaluated the effectiveness of spray disinfection at time intervals of 1, 3, and 10 minutes.
Specimens made of soft denture liners attached to acrylic resin bases (10 per group) were contaminated with Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans. Colony-forming units were counted after different disinfection techniques were applied. Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance on ranks and an all pairwise multiple comparison procedures (Dunn's method) were used to test for significant differences among test groups at the P <.05 level of significance.
Chlorine dioxide was effective against nonporous stainless steel specimens but was inadequate for denture liners at the recommended 3-minute time of disinfection. The immersion technique was more effective than the spray technique, but the difference was not significant. Increasing the time of disinfection did not significantly reduce the numbers of microorganisms.
Coe Soft and Coe Comfort denture liners should be removed before entering the laboratory. These materials contain sufficient viable bacteria after routine disinfection procedures to cause contamination of the "clean laboratory."
软组织义齿衬垫经常需要更换,这就需要将其从义齿基托上完全移除。“清洁实验室”中的高速车床常被用于辅助移除这些材料,但常规消毒程序是否能充分减少细菌污染以防止实验室受到污染尚不清楚。
本研究的第一阶段评估了3分钟二氧化氯喷雾和浸泡消毒程序对2种义齿衬垫(Coe Soft和Coe Comfort)以及用作对照的不锈钢标本的有效性。第二阶段评估了1分钟、3分钟和10分钟时间间隔的喷雾消毒的有效性。
附着在丙烯酸树脂基托上的软质义齿衬垫制成的标本(每组10个)被大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和白色念珠菌污染。应用不同消毒技术后计算菌落形成单位。使用Kruskal-Wallis秩和单向方差分析以及所有成对多重比较程序(邓恩法)在显著性水平P<0.05下检验各测试组之间的显著差异。
二氧化氯对无孔不锈钢标本有效,但在推荐的3分钟消毒时间对义齿衬垫效果不佳。浸泡技术比喷雾技术更有效,但差异不显著。增加消毒时间并未显著减少微生物数量。
Coe Soft和Coe Comfort义齿衬垫在进入实验室前应予以移除。经过常规消毒程序后,这些材料仍含有足够数量的活细菌,会导致“清洁实验室”受到污染。