• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于精神健康消费者及其家庭成员参与宣传活动的调查。

A survey of mental health consumers' and family members' involvement in advocacy.

作者信息

Evans C J, McGaha A C

机构信息

Missouri Institute of Mental Health, St. Louis 63139, USA.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 1998 Dec;34(6):615-23. doi: 10.1023/a:1018715102256.

DOI:10.1023/a:1018715102256
PMID:9833201
Abstract

As the service delivery system is redesigned, the involvement of consumers and family members in mental health policy-making is essential. Advocacy is a way for them to have an impact on policy or decision-making. To determine the extent of their participation in advocacy efforts, consumers and family members were surveyed by other consumers and family members about their involvement in advocacy and mental healthcare reform. Although more family than consumers reported receiving mental healthcare reform information, both groups had difficulty understanding this information. Consumers were more likely to have received information from a mental health professional while family were more likely to have received information from an advocacy group. Lack of economic resources and communication problems were the most often cited barriers to advocacy for consumers. Strategies are suggested for how to increase involvement of consumers and family in advocacy efforts. The limitations of conducting a state-wide study with consumers and family as data collectors is discussed.

摘要

随着服务提供系统的重新设计,消费者和家庭成员参与心理健康政策制定至关重要。倡导是他们影响政策或决策的一种方式。为了确定他们参与倡导工作的程度,其他消费者和家庭成员对消费者和家庭成员进行了调查,了解他们在倡导和精神卫生保健改革方面的参与情况。虽然报告收到精神卫生保健改革信息的家庭成员比消费者多,但两组在理解这些信息方面都有困难。消费者更有可能从心理健康专业人员那里获得信息,而家庭成员更有可能从倡导团体那里获得信息。缺乏经济资源和沟通问题是消费者倡导工作中最常被提及的障碍。文中提出了一些策略,说明如何提高消费者和家庭成员在倡导工作中的参与度。还讨论了以消费者和家庭成员作为数据收集者进行全州范围研究的局限性。

相似文献

1
A survey of mental health consumers' and family members' involvement in advocacy.一项关于精神健康消费者及其家庭成员参与宣传活动的调查。
Community Ment Health J. 1998 Dec;34(6):615-23. doi: 10.1023/a:1018715102256.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
Consumer participation in the planning and delivery of drug treatment services: the current arrangements.消费者参与药物治疗服务的规划与提供:当前的安排
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2008 Mar;27(2):130-7. doi: 10.1080/09595230701829397.
4
Understanding advocacy practice in mental health: a multidimensional scalogram analysis of case records.理解心理健康倡导实践:案例记录的多维标度分析。
J Ment Health. 2018 Apr;27(2):127-134. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1322183. Epub 2017 May 8.
5
Lessons learned from a Maryland citizen advocacy group's experience in impacting health reform: the seven Cs of effective citizen advocacy.
J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil. 2014;13(1-2):21-30. doi: 10.1080/1536710X.2013.870516.
6
Mental Health Consumers' Motives for Seeking Advocacy Support: A Qualitative Exploration.精神健康消费者寻求倡导支持的动机:一项定性探索
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Jul;54(5):607-615. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0177-9. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
7
Priorities of consumers, providers, and family members in the treatment of schizophrenia.消费者、医疗服务提供者及家庭成员在精神分裂症治疗中的优先事项。
Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Jun;53(6):724-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.6.724.
8
Releasing information to families of persons with severe mental illness: a survey of NAMI members.向严重精神疾病患者家属发布信息:对美国全国精神疾病联盟成员的一项调查
Psychiatr Serv. 2000 Aug;51(8):1006-11. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.51.8.1006.
9
How do consumer leaders co-create value in mental health organisations?消费者领袖如何在心理健康组织中共同创造价值?
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Oct;41(5):505-510. doi: 10.1071/AH16105.
10
A national survey of "consumer empowerment" at the state level.一项关于州一级“消费者赋权”的全国性调查。
Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Apr;49(4):498-503. doi: 10.1176/ps.49.4.498.

引用本文的文献

1
Service user involvement in mental health care: an evolutionary concept analysis.服务使用者参与精神卫生保健:一项概念演变分析
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):209-21. doi: 10.1111/hex.12353. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
The potential of consumer participation: sources of understanding.
Can Ment Health. 1989 Jun;37(2):15-7.
2
An advocacy perspective on the AMBHA/NASMHPD White Paper.
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1996 Apr;5(2):24-8.
3
Benefits and challenges of using consumer staff in supported housing services.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 May;44(5):490-1. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.5.490.