Iacono C, Bortolasi L, Facci E, Falezza G, Prati G, Mangiante G, Serio G
Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery C, University of Verona, University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
J Gastrointest Surg. 1997 Sep-Oct;1(5):446-53. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(97)80132-1.
The poor prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma after resection is related to distant metastases and local recurrence that is characterized by a strong tendency to infiltrate the retroperitoneal tissue and spread along the neural plexuses and lymph nodes. Thorough clearance of these tissues around the celiac and mesenteric axes, aorta, and inferior vena cava from the diaphragm to the inferior mesenteric artery (extended pancreaticoduodenectomy may lower the rate of local recurrence, but the procedure has been criticized for its higher morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to compare extended pancreaticoduodenectomy (EPD) with standard pancreaticoduodenectomy (SPD) in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Data from 47 patients who underwent either EPD (n=24) or SPD (n=23) between November 1992 and October 1995 were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative laboratory findings, operative risk (according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification), type of operation (classic Whipple vs. pylorus-preserving Whipple), operative time, intraoperative blood and plasma transfusion, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and postoperative hospital stay were scrutinized. The results showed that all of the parameters considered were similar in the EPD and SPD groups (intraoperative blood transfusion 800+/-490 ml vs. 700+/-586 ml, postoperative mortality 0% vs. 4.3%, overall morbidity 45.8% vs. 47.8%, surgical morbidity 37.5% vs. 34.7%, and postoperative hospital stay 16+/-8.1 days vs. 17+/-13.1 days. These two groups differed only in the operative time, which was significantly longer for EPD than for SPD (360+/-68.9 minutes vs. 330=66.9 minutes, P=0.02). Although the operative time is increased with EPD, there does not appear to be an increase in intraoperative complications, postoperative morbidity and mortality, or postoperative hospital stay with this procedure. However, definitive confirmation of these results can only be provided by a prospective randomized study.
胰腺癌切除术后预后较差与远处转移和局部复发有关,其特点是强烈倾向于浸润腹膜后组织并沿神经丛和淋巴结扩散。从膈肌至肠系膜下动脉,彻底清除腹腔干和肠系膜上动脉轴、主动脉及下腔静脉周围的这些组织(扩大胰十二指肠切除术)可能会降低局部复发率,但该手术因较高的发病率和死亡率而受到批评。我们的目的是比较扩大胰十二指肠切除术(EPD)与标准胰十二指肠切除术(SPD)术后的发病率和死亡率。回顾性分析了1992年11月至1995年10月期间接受EPD(n = 24)或SPD(n = 23)的47例患者的数据。对术前实验室检查结果、手术风险(根据美国麻醉医师协会分类)、手术类型(经典Whipple术式与保留幽门的Whipple术式)、手术时间、术中血液及血浆输注情况、术后发病率和死亡率以及术后住院时间进行了仔细审查。结果显示,EPD组和SPD组所有考虑的参数相似(术中输血800±490 ml对700±586 ml,术后死亡率0%对4.3%,总体发病率45.8%对47.8%,手术相关发病率37.5%对34.7%,术后住院时间16±8.1天对17±13.1天)。这两组仅在手术时间上存在差异,EPD的手术时间明显长于SPD(360±68.9分钟对330±66.9分钟,P = 0.02)。虽然EPD会增加手术时间,但该手术似乎并未增加术中并发症、术后发病率和死亡率或术后住院时间。然而,这些结果的确切证实只能通过前瞻性随机研究来提供。