Mayfield L, Skoglund A, Nobréus N, Attström R
Faculty of Odontology, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998 Oct;9(5):292-302. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090502.x.
Conditions following incorporation of fixed reconstructions, at endosseous titanium implants augmented at local bony dehiscence and fenestration defects using a bioabsorbable Resolut membrane were studied in 7 patients. Fixture stability, radiographic marginal bone levels and peri-implant soft tissue status were evaluated at 21 membrane treated and 17 control fixtures (installed in regions of adequate bone volume), following a 2-year period of functional loading. Prosthetic reconstructions were removed and clinical examination and Periotest values revealed that all fixtures were stable. All peri-implant soft tissues were clinically healthy. The mean probing depths at buccal sites for fixtures with original dehiscence (n = 10) and fenestration (n = 11) defects were 1.6 +/- 0.7 mm and 1.2 +/- 0.4 mm respectively. The control fixture group had a mean buccal probing depth of 1.4 +/- 0.6 mm. At abutment connection radiograph membrane treated fixtures had significantly lower marginal bone levels than control fixtures, indicating that optimal bone regeneration was not achieved at all defects. Mean radiographic bone loss 23-27 months following delivery of fixed reconstructions for original dehiscence and fenestration defect fixtures was 0.7 +/- 0.8 mm and 0.8 +/- 0.6 mm respectively at mesial surfaces, and 0.8 +/- 0.7 mm and 0.6 +/- 0.5 mm at distal surfaces. In the control fixture group a mean loss of 0.7 +/- 0.5 mm at mesial surfaces and 0.5 +/- 0.4 mm at distal surfaces was found. Results showed no significant difference in the rate of bone loss following functional loading between membrane treated and control fixtures.
对7例患者进行了研究,这些患者使用可吸收的Resolut膜在局部骨开裂和开窗缺损处增加骨量后植入了固定式修复体。在进行了2年的功能负荷后,对21个经膜处理的种植体和17个对照种植体(安装在骨量充足的区域)评估了种植体稳定性、影像学边缘骨水平和种植体周围软组织状况。拆除修复体后,临床检查和Periotest值显示所有种植体均稳定。所有种植体周围软组织在临床上均健康。对于最初存在开裂(n = 10)和开窗(n = 11)缺损的种植体,颊侧部位的平均探诊深度分别为1.6±0.7mm和1.2±0.4mm。对照种植体组的颊侧平均探诊深度为1.4±0.6mm。在基台连接处的X线片上,经膜处理的种植体边缘骨水平明显低于对照种植体,表明并非所有缺损处都实现了最佳骨再生。对于最初存在开裂和开窗缺损的种植体,在固定修复体交付后23 - 27个月,近中面的平均影像学骨吸收分别为0.7±0.8mm和0.8±0.6mm,远中面分别为0.8±0.7mm和0.6±0.5mm。在对照种植体组中,近中面平均骨吸收为0.7±0.5mm,远中面为0.5±0.4mm。结果显示,经膜处理的种植体和对照种植体在功能负荷后的骨吸收速率没有显著差异。