• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

120例患者使用Dynaflex阴茎假体的临床经验。

Clinical experience with Dynaflex penile prostheses in 120 patients.

作者信息

Anafarta K, Yaman O, Aydos K

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Ankara School of Medicine, Turkey.

出版信息

Urology. 1998 Dec;52(6):1098-100. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00406-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00406-3
PMID:9836562
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To present our experience with the Dynaflex (American Medical Systems) self-contained inflatable penile prosthesis and define specific complication and patient dissatisfaction rates.

METHODS

From May 1990 through January 1998, 120 men underwent implantation of a Dynaflex prosthesis. The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 80 months (mean 42).

RESULTS

Specific complication rates observed after penile prosthesis implantation were as follows: prosthetic infection, 4.16%; mechanical device failure, 7.5%; and patient dissatisfaction because of inability to work the pump, 16.66%. After intensive teaching, the patient dissatisfaction rate dropped to 0.83%. The overall complication rate was 14.15%.

CONCLUSIONS

With several types of penile prostheses available, Dynaflex can be regarded as an appropriate alternative with a relatively low mechanical failure rate. However, careful preoperative assessment and patient education in the use of the pump mechanism are essential to obtain a successful result.

摘要

目的

介绍我们使用 Dynaflex(美国医疗系统公司)独立式可充气阴茎假体的经验,并确定特定并发症和患者不满意率。

方法

1990年5月至1998年1月,120名男性接受了 Dynaflex 假体植入。随访期为2至80个月(平均42个月)。

结果

阴茎假体植入后观察到的特定并发症发生率如下:假体感染,4.16%;机械装置故障,7.5%;因无法操作泵导致患者不满意,16.66%。经过强化指导后,患者不满意率降至0.83%。总体并发症发生率为14.15%。

结论

有多种类型的阴茎假体可供选择,Dynaflex 可被视为一种合适的替代方案,其机械故障率相对较低。然而,术前仔细评估和对患者进行泵机制使用方面的教育对于获得成功结果至关重要。

相似文献

1
Clinical experience with Dynaflex penile prostheses in 120 patients.120例患者使用Dynaflex阴茎假体的临床经验。
Urology. 1998 Dec;52(6):1098-100. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00406-3.
2
Long-term followup of and patient satisfaction with the Dynaflex self-contained inflatable penile prosthesis.Dynaflex自含式可充气阴茎假体的长期随访及患者满意度
J Urol. 1997 Aug;158(2):456-9.
3
[Our experience with the implant of single component integrated prostheses (Hydroflex-Dynaflex)].[我们使用单组件一体化假体(Hydroflex-Dynaflex)的植入经验]
Actas Urol Esp. 2002 Apr;26(4):261-5. doi: 10.1016/s0210-4806(02)72770-8.
4
Penile prosthetic surgery in neurologically impaired patients: long-term followup.神经功能受损患者的阴茎假体手术:长期随访
J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):1041-4; discussion 1044. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00344-7.
5
Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedures.阴茎假体植入治疗勃起功能障碍的结果:504例手术经验
BJU Int. 2006 Jan;97(1):129-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05907.x.
6
Long-term results with Hydroflex and Dynaflex penile prostheses: device survival comparison to multicomponent inflatables.
J Urol. 1996 May;155(5):1621-3.
7
[Penile prosthetic implant in the treatment of impotence: our experience].[阴茎假体植入治疗阳痿:我们的经验]
Arch Esp Urol. 1994 Sep;47(7):703-8.
8
Long-term survival and patient satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.可膨胀阴茎假体治疗勃起功能障碍的长期生存率及患者满意度
Korean J Urol. 2015 Jun;56(6):461-5. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.6.461. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
9
Contemporary aspects of penile prosthesis implantation.阴茎假体植入的当代进展
Urol Int. 2003;70(2):141-6. doi: 10.1159/000068189.
10
Efficacy and safety of malleable penile prosthesis compared to inflatable penile prosthesis in erectile dysfunction patients.可塑 penile 假体与充气 penile 假体治疗勃起功能障碍患者的疗效和安全性比较。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2024 Jun 27;96(2):12353. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2024.12353.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent technological development of penile prosthesis: a literature review.阴茎假体的最新技术发展:文献综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Jan 31;13(1):165-184. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-741. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
2
Technological advances in penile implants: past, present, future.阴茎植入物的技术进展:过去、现在、未来。
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Nov;35(7):629-633. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00689-2. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
3
Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.阴茎假体植入技术与手术结果的叙述性综述,包括 transgender 患者。 (注:这里“transgender”可能是特定语境下的表述,一般常用“transgender people”指跨性别者,更准确的表述可结合上下文进一步调整。)
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Jun;10(6):2629-2647. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1279.
4
A systematic review of penile prosthesis infection and meta-analysis of diabetes mellitus role.阴茎假体感染的系统评价及糖尿病作用的荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00730-2.
5
Surgical patient selection and counseling.手术患者的选择与咨询。
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Aug;6(4):609-619. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.07.19.
6
Penile prosthesis implant: scientific advances and technological innovations over the last four decades.阴茎假体植入:过去四十年的科学进展与技术创新
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Feb;6(1):37-45. doi: 10.21037/tau.2016.12.06.
7
Contemporary patient satisfaction rates for three-piece inflatable penile prostheses.三件式可充气阴茎假体的当代患者满意度
Adv Urol. 2012;2012:707321. doi: 10.1155/2012/707321. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
8
Current status of penile prosthesis implantation.阴茎假体植入的现状。
Curr Urol Rep. 2000 Dec;1(4):291-6. doi: 10.1007/s11934-000-0009-1.