Mäurer M, Shambal S, Berg D, Woydt M, Hofmann E, Georgiadis D, Lindner A, Becker G
Department of Neurology, Bayerische Julius-Maximilians-Univerisität, Würzburg, Germany.
Stroke. 1998 Dec;29(12):2563-7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.12.2563.
The differential diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage versus ischemic stroke has critical implications for stroke management. Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCS) has been shown to identify intracerebral hemorrhages and intracerebral vessel occlusions. We conducted this study to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of TCCS in this differential diagnosis and in the detection of stroke complications.
One hundred fifty-one patients (58 women, 93 men; mean age, 65.6 years [range, 32 to 89 years] ) with acute hemiparesis were enrolled in this prospective study. On admission all patients had a complete neurological examination. A cranial CT scan and a sonographic examination of the brain parenchyma and all extracranial and intracranial cerebral arteries were conducted. The sonographer was blinded for the radiological findings.
According to CT criteria, 60 patients had an intracerebral hemorrhage and 67 patients had an ischemic stroke, and in 24 patients CT findings were inconclusive, showing neither bleeding nor an ischemic stroke. On sonographic examination, 18 patients (12%) had no sufficient acoustic bone window. Of the remaining 133 patients, 126 (95%) were diagnosed correctly by sonography in agreement with CT. Sonography missed 3 atypical bleedings (2 with upper parietal location). In 4 patients without bleeding, an intracerebral hemorrhage was suspected by TCCS because of increased white matter echo density due to microangiopathy. Stroke complications depicted by CT (disturbance of cerebrospinal fluid circulation, hemorrhagic transformation, midline shift, ventricular bleeding) (n=54) were correctly shown by TCCS in 45 patients (83%). No complication was missed that would have required further treatment.
In comparison to the "gold standard" of CT, TCCS identified stroke complications and differentiated between intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke with reasonable sensitivity. Thus, if CT is not readily available, TCCS may complement clinical examination in patients with acute stroke. In addition, it may also be useful in detecting stroke complications in the follow-up of stroke patients.
脑出血与缺血性卒中的鉴别诊断对卒中治疗具有关键意义。经颅彩色编码双功能超声(TCCS)已被证明可识别脑出血和脑内血管闭塞。我们开展本研究以评估TCCS在这种鉴别诊断及卒中并发症检测中的敏感性和特异性。
151例急性偏瘫患者(58例女性,93例男性;平均年龄65.6岁[范围32至89岁])纳入本前瞻性研究。入院时所有患者均进行了全面的神经系统检查。进行了头颅CT扫描以及脑实质、所有颅外和颅内脑动脉的超声检查。超声检查人员对放射学检查结果不知情。
根据CT标准,60例患者为脑出血,67例患者为缺血性卒中,24例患者的CT检查结果不明确,既未显示出血也未显示缺血性卒中。在超声检查中,18例患者(12%)没有足够的声学骨窗。在其余133例患者中,126例(95%)经超声检查诊断正确,与CT结果一致。超声检查漏诊了3例非典型出血(2例位于顶叶上部)。在4例无出血的患者中,TCCS因微血管病导致白质回声密度增加而怀疑有脑出血。CT显示的卒中并发症(脑脊液循环障碍、出血转化、中线移位、脑室出血)(n = 54)在45例患者(83%)中被TCCS正确显示。没有遗漏任何需要进一步治疗的并发症。
与CT“金标准”相比,TCCS以合理的敏感性识别卒中并发症并区分脑出血和缺血性卒中。因此,如果无法立即进行CT检查,TCCS可补充急性卒中患者的临床检查。此外,它在卒中患者随访中检测卒中并发症方面也可能有用。