Suppr超能文献

以使用牙线作为辅助手段,对刷牙的擦洗法和巴斯刷牙法进行比较评估(针对五年级和六年级学生)。

A comparative evaluation of the Scrub and Bass Methods of toothbrushing with flossing as an adjunct (in fifth and sixth graders).

作者信息

Robinson E

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1976 Nov;66(11):1078-81. doi: 10.2105/ajph.66.11.1078.

Abstract

The Scrub and Bass Methods of toothbrushing with flossing as an adjunct were evaluated to determine which is most effective in eliminating or reducing plaque and gingivitis in 5th and 6th grade school children. Three hundred and eleven children were randomly selected and placed in five groups (Scrub, Scrub-Floss, Bass, Bass-Floss, Comparison). Four Method groups went through four weeks of daily supervised toothbrushing with four dental hygienists, while the Comparison group received no supervised instructions. There was a marked effect on oral hygiene and gingival conditions at the end of the experimental period in all four groups with no one method superior to another. Peer group intercommunication probably accounts for the improvement in the comparison group.

摘要

评估了以牙线辅助的刷牙擦洗法和巴斯刷牙法,以确定哪种方法在消除或减少五年级和六年级小学生的牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面最有效。随机选择了311名儿童,并将其分为五组(擦洗组、擦洗-牙线组、巴斯组、巴斯-牙线组、对照组)。四个方法组在四名牙科保健员的每日监督下进行了四周的刷牙,而对照组没有接受监督指导。在实验期结束时,所有四个组的口腔卫生和牙龈状况都有显著改善,没有一种方法优于另一种方法。同伴群体之间的相互交流可能是对照组改善的原因。

相似文献

10
Effects of supervised daily dental plaque removal by children after 3 years.儿童3年后每日在监督下清除牙菌斑的效果。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1980 Aug;8(4):171-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1980.tb01281.x.

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验