Giacomini P, Sorace F, Magrini A, Alessandrini M
Clinica Otorinolaringoiatrica, Università di Roma Tor Vergata.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 1998 Apr;18(2):83-7.
Static posturography studies the frequency at which the center of gravity in the human body oscillates. There is no universal agreement as to the importance of this index or whether it is specific in identifying alterations in the postural control systems (vestibular, proprioceptive and visual). Nevertheless, some hypotheses appear generally accepted: a) visual information dominates; b) proprioception affects anterior-posterior oscillation; c) relatively low frequency body oscillation is affected by vestibular input while higher frequency oscillations are controlled by proprioceptive information. In order to check these hypotheses, four groups of patients underwent spectral analysis of bodily oscillations recorded with static posturography. The four groups of patients were similar in terms of age and broken down as follows: Group A-peripheral diabetic neuropathy (10 cases); Group B-diabetic neuropathy-free patients (10 cases); Group C-pure peripheral vestibulopathy (10 cases); Group D-normal subjects (20 cases). Analysis was performed dividing the frequency spectrum (FFT) into three groups: gr. I) 0.01-0.7 Hz; gr. II) 0.7-1 Hz; gr. III) > 1 Hz. Analysis of the spectra for Group A showed a significant increase in high frequency bodily oscillation (gr. III) with the eyes open in the anterior-posterior direction (M = 8.6 +/- 5.5; p < 0.05) and in the lateral direction (M = 4.0 +/- 2.0; p < 0.05); an increase was also found in both directions with the eyes closed (M = OCX II: 7.4 +/- 1.5; p < 0.05) (M = OCX III: 5.6 +/- 1.6; p < 0.01) (M = OCY II: 16.8 +/- 5.0; p < 0.05) (M = OCY II: 9.2 +/- 4.4; p < 0.05). In Group B the increase was limited to high frequency anterior-posterior oscillations (gr. III) at open eyes (M = 3.6 +/- 1.6; p < 0.05) and at closed eyes (M = 4.4 +/- 1.5; p < 0.05). In Group C there was an increase in high frequency lateral oscillations (gr. III) at open eyes (M = 4.2 +/- 0.5; p < 0.01) and panfrequency oscillations at closed eyes (M = OCX I: 47.7 +/- 5.6; p < 0.01) (M = OCX II: 23.2 +/- 4.9; p < 0.01) (M = OCX III: 7.2 +/- 2.3; p < 0.05).
The diabetic proprioceptive deficit appears to lead to multiplanar destabilization at the medium-to-high frequency range. The labyrinthine deficit, on the other hand, appears to cause lateral destabilization at all frequencies. The method of analysis used appears to provide useful parameters with which to evaluate static posture since they can specifically identify alterations in orthostatic bodily control of various origins.
静态姿势描记法研究人体重心摆动的频率。对于该指标的重要性或其在识别姿势控制系统(前庭、本体感觉和视觉)改变方面是否具有特异性,目前尚无普遍共识。然而,一些假设似乎已被广泛接受:a)视觉信息占主导;b)本体感觉影响前后摆动;c)相对低频的身体摆动受前庭输入影响,而高频摆动则由本体感觉信息控制。为验证这些假设,四组患者接受了通过静态姿势描记法记录的身体摆动的频谱分析。这四组患者在年龄方面相似,分组如下:A组——糖尿病周围神经病变患者(10例);B组——无糖尿病神经病变的患者(10例);C组——单纯周围性前庭病变患者(10例);D组——正常受试者(20例)。分析时将频谱(快速傅里叶变换)分为三组:I组)0.01 - 0.7赫兹;II组)0.7 - 1赫兹;III组)>1赫兹。对A组频谱的分析显示,睁眼时前后方向高频身体摆动显著增加(M = 8.6 ± 5.5;p < 0.05)以及侧向方向高频身体摆动显著增加(M = 4.0 ± 2.0;p < 0.05);闭眼时两个方向也均有增加(M = OCX II:7.4 ± 1.5;p < 0.05)(M = OCX III:5.6 ± 1.6;p < 0.01)(M = OCY II:16.8 ± 5.0;p < 0.05)(M = OCY II:9.2 ± 4.4;p < 0.05)。B组的增加仅限于睁眼和闭眼时的前后方向高频摆动(III组)(睁眼时M = 3.6 ± 1.6;p < 0.05,闭眼时M = 4.4 ± 1.5;p < 0.05)。C组睁眼时高频侧向摆动(III组)增加(M = 4.2 ± 0.5;p < 0.01),闭眼时全频摆动增加(M = OCX I:47.7 ± 5.6;p < 0.01)(M = OCX II:23.2 ± 4.9;p < 0.01)(M = OCX III:7.2 ± 2.3;p < 0.05)。
糖尿病性本体感觉缺陷似乎导致中高频范围内的多平面失稳。另一方面,迷路缺陷似乎在所有频率下均导致侧向失稳。所使用的分析方法似乎提供了有用的参数,可用于评估静态姿势,因为它们能够特异性地识别各种原因引起的直立身体控制的改变。