Kisch A L, Bartholomew L
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Sep;10(3):507-10. doi: 10.1128/AAC.10.3.507.
The in vitro activity of each of two oral [cefatrizine (BL-S640), cephalexin] and three parenteral (cefamandole, cefazolin, cephapirin) cephalosporin antibiotics was compared with that of cephalothin against 168 clinical isolates of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria selected as resistant to 20 mug of cephaloridine per ml on the basis of agar dilution susceptibility test data. Each of the five other cephalosporins inhibited a greater percentage of gram-negative bacillary isolates than did cephalothin or cephaloridine, with minimal inhibitory concentration values ranging 2- to 50-fold lower. Significant differences between minimal inhibitory concentrations of the compounds tested were also observed in tests against strains of Streptococcus faecalis and of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Potential advantages of including more than a single cephalosporin antibiotic in the panel of antibiotics used for routine susceptibility testing, suggested by these observations, are discussed.
根据琼脂稀释药敏试验数据,从对每毫升20微克头孢啶耐药的菌株中挑选出168株革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性临床分离菌,比较了两种口服头孢菌素(头孢曲嗪(BL-S640)、头孢氨苄)和三种胃肠外给药头孢菌素(头孢孟多、头孢唑林、头孢匹林)对这些菌株的体外活性与头孢噻吩的体外活性。其他五种头孢菌素中的每一种对革兰氏阴性杆菌分离株的抑制百分比均高于头孢噻吩或头孢啶,其最低抑菌浓度值低2至50倍。在针对粪肠球菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的试验中,也观察到了受试化合物最低抑菌浓度之间的显著差异。这些观察结果表明了在用于常规药敏试验的抗生素组中纳入不止一种头孢菌素抗生素的潜在优势,并对此进行了讨论。