Suppr超能文献

创伤性颅内颈动脉树动脉瘤

Traumatic intracranial carotid tree aneurysms.

作者信息

Uzan M, Cantasdemir M, Seckin M S, Hanci M, Kocer N, Sarioglu A C, Islak C

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Istanbul, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Turkey.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 1998 Dec;43(6):1314-20; discussion 1320-2. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199812000-00024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to elucidate the requirements for angiographic evaluation in blunt head injuries, the timing of angiography, and the selection of appropriate therapeutic approaches.

METHODS

Twelve cases of traumatic aneurysms (TAs) in the intracranial carotid tree were analyzed in this study. Neurological examination results, computed tomographic scans, pre- and postembolization cerebral angiograms, and follow-up data were included.

RESULTS

In 11 of 12 cases, TAs were of cranial base origin; in 1 case, the aneurysm was located in the distal anterior cerebral artery. In seven of the cases with cranial base lesions, aneurysms were located in the intracavernous segment of the internal carotid artery; all of the computed tomographic scans for these cases demonstrated sphenoid sinus wall fractures and hematoma in the sphenoid sinus. In two cases, although the initial angiograms revealed no lesions, a second study performed 2 weeks later demonstrated the presence of aneurysms. Nine of the aneurysms were treated with endovascular techniques, two were managed conservatively, and the remaining one patient died with massive epistaxis while awaiting surgical treatment. No morbidity or additional permanent neurological deficits occurred in the endovascularly treated patient group.

CONCLUSION

Patients with head trauma who present with sphenoid sinus fractures and massive epistaxis should be evaluated for the development of TAs as soon as possible. If the patients exhibit fractures without epistaxis, angiography should be deferred for 2 to 3 weeks; if the first angiographic evaluation reveals normal findings, repeated epistaxis should prompt a second angiographic evaluation. Current treatment of TAs involves occlusion of the main artery through the use of endovascular techniques. Cases involving internal carotid artery TAs of cranial base origin and patients who do not tolerate test occlusion require extracranial-to-intracranial bypass surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在阐明钝性头部损伤血管造影评估的要求、血管造影的时机以及合适治疗方法的选择。

方法

本研究分析了12例颅内颈动脉树创伤性动脉瘤(TA)病例。纳入了神经学检查结果、计算机断层扫描、栓塞前后脑血管造影以及随访数据。

结果

12例病例中有11例TA起源于颅底;1例动脉瘤位于大脑前动脉远端。在7例颅底病变病例中,动脉瘤位于颈内动脉海绵窦段;这些病例的所有计算机断层扫描均显示蝶窦壁骨折和蝶窦内血肿。2例病例中,尽管初始血管造影未显示病变,但2周后进行的第二次检查显示存在动脉瘤。9例动脉瘤采用血管内技术治疗,2例保守治疗,其余1例患者在等待手术治疗时因大量鼻出血死亡。血管内治疗患者组未出现并发症或额外的永久性神经功能缺损。

结论

出现蝶窦骨折和大量鼻出血的头部外伤患者应尽快评估是否发生TA。如果患者有骨折但无鼻出血,血管造影应推迟2至3周;如果首次血管造影评估结果正常,反复鼻出血应促使进行第二次血管造影评估。目前TA的治疗包括通过血管内技术闭塞主要动脉。涉及颅底起源的颈内动脉TA的病例以及不能耐受试验性闭塞的患者需要进行颅外至颅内搭桥手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验