Suppr超能文献

两种狐狸(赤狐)抗狂犬病诱饵投放方案的效果比较。

Comparison of the effectiveness of two protocols of antirabies bait distribution for foxes (Vulpes vulpes).

作者信息

Vuillaume P, Bruyere V, Aubert M

机构信息

Laboratoire d'études sur la rage et la pathologie des animaux sauvages, CNEVA, Malzéville, France.

出版信息

Vet Res. 1998 Nov-Dec;29(6):537-46.

PMID:9851010
Abstract

In a plateau and hill region of France (the Doubs), two protocols of rabies vaccine bait distribution targeted at foxes were compared: helicopter distribution of vaccine baits alone (control zone) and a combined aerial distribution by helicopter with an additional deposit of vaccine baits at fox den entrances by foot (test zone). In the test zone covering an area of 436 km2, baits were distributed by helicopter at a rate of 13.4 baits/km2. Additionally, an average of 11.4 vaccine baits at the entrances of 871 fox dens were terrestrially distributed by 110 persons (9,964 baits). In this test zone, 90% of the young foxes were marked with tetracycline which permitted estimation of the bait consumption; however, only 38% had significant titre of rabies antibodies and less than one fox cub per 2.4 of those having consumed at least one bait were immunized. In the control zone, these percentages were significantly lower: respectively, 35 and 17% and one fox cub per 4.2. The relative lack of benefit between bait uptake and rate of immunological response may be due to maternal immunity which could have interfered with fox cub active immunization. A booster effect following a second distribution of baits by foot may be suggested in both adult foxes and their offspring. That these baits needed to be terrestrially distributed in order to obtain a booster effect is uncertain. Terrestrial distribution at fox den entrances is difficult to do and entails additional expenses not incurred in aerial distribution. The cost of terrestrial vaccination is 3.5 times higher than classical aerial vaccination and takes 63.5 times longer. A cost effective analysis of this type of supplementary terrestrial intervention determined that bait deposit at den entrances can be recommended for restricted areas, where residual focii exist, as a complement to the aerial distribution of baits.

摘要

在法国的一个高原和丘陵地区(杜省),对两种针对狐狸的狂犬病疫苗诱饵投放方案进行了比较:仅通过直升机投放疫苗诱饵(对照区)以及直升机空中联合投放并由人工在狐狸洞穴入口额外投放疫苗诱饵(试验区)。在面积为436平方公里的试验区,通过直升机以每平方公里13.4个诱饵的速度投放诱饵。此外,110人在871个狐狸洞穴入口平均地面投放了11.4个疫苗诱饵(共9964个诱饵)。在该试验区,90%的幼狐用四环素做了标记,这有助于估计诱饵消耗量;然而,只有38%的幼狐产生了显著的狂犬病抗体效价,每2.4只至少食用过一个诱饵的幼狐中不到一只获得免疫。在对照区,这些百分比显著更低:分别为35%和17%,每4.2只幼狐中有一只获得免疫。诱饵摄取量与免疫反应率之间相对缺乏效益可能是由于母源免疫,它可能干扰了幼狐的主动免疫。对于成年狐狸及其后代,可能建议在第二次人工投放诱饵后产生增强效果。这些诱饵需要地面投放才能获得增强效果尚不确定。在狐狸洞穴入口进行地面投放操作困难,且会产生空中投放所没有的额外费用。地面接种疫苗的成本比传统空中接种疫苗高3.5倍,耗时则长63.5倍。对这种补充性地面干预措施的成本效益分析确定,对于存在残留疫点的受限区域,可建议在洞穴入口投放诱饵,作为空中投放诱饵的补充。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验