• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型转基因粮食作物:科学认知与公众认知概述

Novel and transgenic food crops: overview of scientific versus public perception.

作者信息

Ruibal-Mendieta N L, Lints F A

机构信息

European Interuniversity Association on Society, Science and Technology (ESST), Université Catholique de Louvain.

出版信息

Transgenic Res. 1998 Sep;7(5):379-86. doi: 10.1023/a:1008845323046.

DOI:10.1023/a:1008845323046
PMID:9859226
Abstract

Recombinant DNA technology offers opportunities to develop new products in many different fields, including agriculture and the agro-food area. Transgenic plants with improved agronomic traits currently grow in field trials and a few varieties have already reached the European market. By and large, new technologies raise both concerns and expectations and modern biotechnology is no exception. Indeed, a voluntary moratorium on experiments involving recombinant DNA molecules was called for in 1974. At the present time, although a majority of academic and industrial scientists agree that transgenic food crops pose no risk for the environment or human health, some others believe that certain applications of modern plant biotechnology are hazardous. In particular, deliberate releases of genetically modified plants are regarded as risky. There is also a disparity between expert and lay perception of r-DNA technology applications to food crops, which makes public information a difficult task. This paper aims at exposing these conflicting points of view on the agricultural applications of modern biotechnology. We also propose some recommendations pertaining to public information in Europe. It appears that consensus conferences might be a good approach to stimulate public information and public debate in Europe, although this approach has to be adapted to the cultural context of each country.

摘要

重组DNA技术为包括农业和农业食品领域在内的许多不同领域开发新产品提供了机会。具有改良农艺性状的转基因植物目前正在进行田间试验种植,一些品种已经进入欧洲市场。总体而言,新技术既引发了担忧,也带来了期望,现代生物技术也不例外。事实上,1974年就有人呼吁自愿暂停涉及重组DNA分子的实验。目前,虽然大多数学术和工业科学家都认为转基因粮食作物对环境或人类健康没有风险,但也有一些人认为现代植物生物技术的某些应用是有害的。特别是,故意释放转基因植物被认为是有风险的。专家和普通公众对将重组DNA技术应用于粮食作物的看法也存在差异,这使得向公众提供信息成为一项艰巨的任务。本文旨在揭示关于现代生物技术在农业应用方面的这些相互冲突的观点。我们还提出了一些与欧洲公众信息相关的建议。虽然这种方法必须适应每个国家的文化背景,但共识会议似乎可能是在欧洲促进公众信息和公众辩论的一个好方法。

相似文献

1
Novel and transgenic food crops: overview of scientific versus public perception.新型转基因粮食作物:科学认知与公众认知概述
Transgenic Res. 1998 Sep;7(5):379-86. doi: 10.1023/a:1008845323046.
2
Application of modern biotechnology to food and agriculture: food systems perspective.现代生物技术在食品与农业中的应用:食品系统视角
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2003 Nov-Dec;35(6):319-32. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60347-3.
3
An analytical approach to the implementation of genetically modified crops.转基因作物实施的一种分析方法。
Trends Biotechnol. 2000 Dec;18(12):484-6. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7799(00)01509-2.
4
EC struggles to unravel regulations.欧洲委员会在努力理清各项规定方面遇到困难。
Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Jul;18(7):705-6. doi: 10.1038/77249.
5
Development of an agricultural biotechnology crop product: testing from discovery to commercialization.农业生物技术作物产品的开发:从发现到商业化的测试。
J Agric Food Chem. 2012 Oct 17;60(41):10179-87. doi: 10.1021/jf302706e. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
6
Britain's genetically modified crop controversies: the Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission and the negotiation of 'uncertainty'.英国的转基因作物争议:农业与环境生物技术委员会以及“不确定性”的协商
Community Genet. 2006;9(3):170-7. doi: 10.1159/000092653.
7
Ending world hunger. The promise of biotechnology and the threat of antiscience zealotry.终结全球饥饿。生物技术的前景与反科学狂热的威胁。
Plant Physiol. 2000 Oct;124(2):487-90. doi: 10.1104/pp.124.2.487.
8
Environmental and food safety issues of genetically modified crops.转基因作物的环境与食品安全问题
J Environ Monit. 2001 Feb;3(2):26N-32N. doi: 10.1039/b102253a.
9
Will genetically modified foods be allergenic?转基因食品会引起过敏反应吗?
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 May;107(5):765-71. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.114241.
10
Next biotech plants: new traits, crops, developers and technologies for addressing global challenges.下一个生物技术工厂:解决全球挑战的新特性、作物、开发者和技术。
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016 Aug;36(4):675-90. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2015.1004521. Epub 2015 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Affecting Social Media Users' Emotions Regarding Food Safety Issues: Content Analysis of a Debate among Chinese Weibo Users on Genetically Modified Food Security.影响社交媒体用户对食品安全问题情绪的因素:中国微博用户关于转基因食品安全辩论的内容分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jan 21;9(2):113. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020113.

本文引用的文献

1
Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: risk, benefit, and ethics.英国公众对基因工程的一般应用和特定应用的关注:风险、益处与伦理。
Sci Technol Human Values. 1997 Winter;22(1):98-124. doi: 10.1177/016224399702200105.
2
The recombinant DNA controversy: twenty years later.重组DNA争议:二十年后
Biotechnology (N Y). 1995 Oct;13(10):1132-4. doi: 10.1038/nbt1095-1132.
3
Ripen-on-command: in a society with ample food, why bother?
Nat Biotechnol. 1996 Jul;14(7):800. doi: 10.1038/nbt0796-800.
4
Milestones in crop biotechnology--transgenic cassava and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize.
Nat Biotechnol. 1996 Jun;14(6):702-3. doi: 10.1038/nbt0696-702.
5
Biotechnology and society: we scientists have responsibilities too.生物技术与社会:我们科学家也负有责任。
J Nutr. 1996 Apr;126(4 Suppl):1017S-9S. doi: 10.1093/jn/126.Suppl_4.1017S.
6
Plant biotechnology. Lay U.K. panel savors debate.
Science. 1994 Nov 11;266(5187):964-5. doi: 10.1126/science.7973677.
7
Public information and the ethical responsibility of the industry.公共信息与行业的道德责任。
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Sep;16(7):491-6.
8
What the public thinks about biotechnology.
Biotechnology (N Y). 1994 Sep;12(9):870-1, 873-5. doi: 10.1038/nbt0994-870.
9
Who's who in European antibiotech. Taking a look at public interest and environmental groups that take a special interest in biotechnology.
Biotechnology (N Y). 1993 Jan;11(1):44-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt0193-44.
10
Position of the American Dietetic Association: biotechnology and the future of food.
J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Dec;95(12):1429-32. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(95)00376-2.