• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共信息与行业的道德责任。

Public information and the ethical responsibility of the industry.

作者信息

Bieri F

机构信息

Pharma Information, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Sep;16(7):491-6.

PMID:7885074
Abstract

Biotechnology and gene technology are recognized by experts as invaluable and unique tools to find solutions to or improve many problems in health, agriculture and management of the environment, and are regarded as a driving economic force in the next century. They are, however, by large not accepted by the public and the discussion on gene technology is often emotional or even controversial. This situation is not favorable to a constructive and open debate. Science, economic forces and society coexist symbiotically and a broad debate on all aspects including the social and ethical issues of biotechnology is essential. A mutual understanding and acceptance are prerequisites to the democratic process of the elaboration of sound regulation and appropriate administration. To this aim, a task force was initiated in Switzerland by the pharmaceutical industry. Its goal is to provide information on relevant aspects of biotechnology and to participate in the dialogue with the Swiss public and politicians on critical issues like risk assessment, ethics, safety, novel food and legislation. A documentation service, teaching material, national poster campaign, exhibitions and debates on specific issues are the contributions of the industry to a fair information in favor of the improved background to an educated and open debate.

摘要

生物技术和基因技术被专家们视为解决或改善健康、农业及环境管理等诸多问题的宝贵且独特的工具,被视作下个世纪推动经济发展的一股力量。然而,它们在很大程度上不为公众所接受,关于基因技术的讨论往往带有情绪化甚至充满争议。这种情况不利于进行建设性的公开辩论。科学、经济力量和社会共生共存,就生物技术的各个方面,包括其社会和伦理问题展开广泛辩论至关重要。相互理解和接受是制定合理监管和适当管理的民主进程的先决条件。为此,瑞士的制药行业发起了一个特别工作组。其目标是提供有关生物技术相关方面的信息,并就风险评估、伦理、安全、新型食品和立法等关键问题,与瑞士公众和政界人士展开对话。行业提供的文献服务、教材、全国性海报宣传活动、展览以及关于特定问题的辩论,都是为了提供公正信息,以利于为有见识且开放的辩论营造更好的背景。

相似文献

1
Public information and the ethical responsibility of the industry.公共信息与行业的道德责任。
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Sep;16(7):491-6.
2
The Human Genome Project in the United States: a perspective on the commercial, ethical, legislative and health care issues.美国的人类基因组计划:关于商业、伦理、立法及医疗保健问题的视角
J Int Bioethique. 1991 Jul-Sep;2(3):149-57.
3
Public health issues related with the consumption of food obtained from genetically modified organisms.与食用转基因生物获得的食品相关的公共卫生问题。
Biotechnol Annu Rev. 2004;10:85-122. doi: 10.1016/S1387-2656(04)10004-5.
4
Options for a rational dialogue on the acceptance of biotechnology.关于接受生物技术进行理性对话的选项。
Biotechnol J. 2007 Sep;2(9):1121-8. doi: 10.1002/biot.200700069.
5
Future societal issues in industrial biotechnology.工业生物技术未来的社会问题。
Biotechnol J. 2007 Sep;2(9):1112-20. doi: 10.1002/biot.200700089.
6
Transparent communication strategy on GMOs: will it change public opinion?关于转基因生物的透明沟通策略:它会改变公众舆论吗?
Biotechnol J. 2007 Sep;2(9):1141-6. doi: 10.1002/biot.200700133.
7
Reflections: ethics and the recombinant DNA debate.反思:伦理与重组DNA辩论
J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1982;2(1):51-63.
8
Scientific Citizenship and good governance: implications for biotechnology.科学公民身份与善治:对生物技术的影响
Trends Biotechnol. 2006 Feb;24(2):57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.12.007. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
9
Biotechnology: history shapes German opinion.生物技术:历史塑造德国观点。
Forum Appl Res Public Policy. 1991;6(4):92-8.
10
Industry involvement in Australian agrobiotechnology: the views of scientists.澳大利亚农业生物技术领域的行业参与情况:科学家们的观点
Australas Biotechnol. 1994 Nov-Dec;4(6):362-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel and transgenic food crops: overview of scientific versus public perception.新型转基因粮食作物:科学认知与公众认知概述
Transgenic Res. 1998 Sep;7(5):379-86. doi: 10.1023/a:1008845323046.