• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动化过程中学到了什么?二、空间位置的强制编码。

What is learned during automatization? II. Obligatory encoding of spatial location.

作者信息

Logan G D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Ilinois at Urbana-Champaign 61820, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Dec;24(6):1720-36. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.6.1720.

DOI:10.1037//0096-1523.24.6.1720
PMID:9861719
Abstract

Six experiments addressed the encoding of location information during automatization, to test a critical prediction of the instance theory of automaticity (G. D. Logan, 1988). Subjects searched 1- or 2-word displays for members of a target category. Specific targets appeared in the same locations consistently throughout training, and then location changed at transfer. Sensitivity to changes in location were assessed with implicit and explicit memory tests. In both tests, sensitivity depended on the number of locations the words could occupy (2 vs. 16). Sensitivity varied with the number of words presented (1 vs. 2) in the implicit test, but not in the explicit test. The results suggest that subjects encoded the locations of the words during automatization, which confirms the predictions of the instance theory.

摘要

六个实验探讨了自动化过程中位置信息的编码,以检验自动性实例理论(G. D. 洛根,1988)的一个关键预测。受试者在由1个或2个单词组成的显示中搜索目标类别的成员。在整个训练过程中,特定目标始终出现在相同位置,然后在迁移时位置发生变化。通过内隐和外显记忆测试评估对位置变化的敏感性。在这两种测试中,敏感性取决于单词可占据的位置数量(2个与16个)。在内隐测试中,敏感性随呈现的单词数量(1个与2个)而变化,但在外显测试中并非如此。结果表明,受试者在自动化过程中对单词的位置进行了编码,这证实了实例理论的预测。

相似文献

1
What is learned during automatization? II. Obligatory encoding of spatial location.自动化过程中学到了什么?二、空间位置的强制编码。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Dec;24(6):1720-36. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.6.1720.
2
The role of attention in automatization: does attention operate at encoding, or retrieval, or both?注意力在自动化过程中的作用:注意力是在编码阶段起作用,还是在检索阶段起作用,抑或是在两者都起作用?
Mem Cognit. 1997 Jan;25(1):36-46. doi: 10.3758/bf03197283.
3
Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.阅读自动化与斯特鲁普任务:检验非自主文字处理的极限
Am J Psychol. 2002 Winter;115(4):515-43.
4
Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.情境线索化:视觉情境的内隐学习与记忆引导空间注意力。
Cogn Psychol. 1998 Jun;36(1):28-71. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0681.
5
"Good is up" is not always better: a memory advantage for words in metaphor-incompatible locations.“好在上”并非总是更好:隐喻不兼容位置中词语的记忆优势。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e108269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108269. eCollection 2014.
6
Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.物体及其位置记忆中的性别差异:关于自动与控制编码及检索情境的一项研究
Brain Cogn. 2008 Apr;66(3):232-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
7
Independent operation of implicit working memory under cognitive load.认知负荷下内隐工作记忆的独立运作。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Oct;55:214-222. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.08.014. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
8
Acquisition and automatization of a complex task: an examination of three-ball cascade juggling.
J Mot Behav. 2003 Jun;35(2):109-18. doi: 10.1080/00222890309602126.
9
Instance theory predicts information theory: Episodic uncertainty as a determinant of keystroke dynamics.实例理论预测信息理论:情景不确定性作为按键动力学的一个决定因素。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Dec;73(4):203-215. doi: 10.1037/cep0000182. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
10
Instance-based automaticity and aging: acquisition, reacquisition, and long-term retention.
Psychol Aging. 2000 Sep;15(3):551-65. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.15.3.551.

引用本文的文献

1
Object weight can be rapidly predicted, with low cognitive load, by exploiting learned associations between the weights and locations of objects.通过利用物体重量与其所在位置之间的习得关联,可以快速、低认知负荷地预测物体重量。
J Neurophysiol. 2023 Feb 1;129(2):285-297. doi: 10.1152/jn.00414.2022. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
2
Context Binding in Visual Working Memory Is Reflected in Bilateral Event-Related Potentials, But Not in Contralateral Delay Activity.上下文绑定在视觉工作记忆中的反映在双侧事件相关电位,但不在对侧延迟活动中。
eNeuro. 2022 Nov 9;9(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0207-22.2022. Print 2022 Nov-Dec.
3
More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
更多的捕获,更多的抑制:由于统计规律而产生的分心物抑制取决于注意捕获的强度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Feb;27(1):86-95. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01672-z.
4
Is Your Color My Color? Dividing the Labor of the Stroop Task Between Co-actors.你的颜色是我的颜色吗?共同行动者之间Stroop任务的分工
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 6;9:1407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01407. eCollection 2018.
5
Aging and the strategic use of context to control prospective memory monitoring.衰老与运用情境策略来控制前瞻性记忆监测。
Psychol Aging. 2018 May;33(3):527-544. doi: 10.1037/pag0000247.
6
Effects of Cogmed working memory training on cognitive performance.认知加工训练对认知表现的影响。
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1506-1518. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1012-9. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
7
Attentional influences on memory formation: A tale of a not-so-simple story.注意力对记忆形成的影响:一个并非那么简单的故事。
Mem Cognit. 2018 May;46(4):544-557. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0784-2.
8
The strategic control of prospective memory monitoring in response to complex and probabilistic contextual cues.对复杂且概率性情境线索做出反应时前瞻性记忆监控的策略控制。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Jul;45(5):755-775. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0696-1.
9
Decomposing experience-driven attention: Opposite attentional effects of previously predictive cues.分解经验驱动的注意力:先前预测性线索的相反注意力效应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2185-98. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1101-z.
10
Activation of context-specific attentional control sets by exogenous allocation of visual attention to the context?通过将视觉注意力外源性分配到情境中,来激活特定情境的注意力控制集?
Psychol Res. 2017 Mar;81(2):378-391. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0746-5. Epub 2016 Feb 5.