• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童肠吻合术:两种不同技术的比较研究

Intestinal anastomosis in children: a comparative study between two different techniques.

作者信息

Ordorica-Flores R M, Bracho-Blanchet E, Nieto-Zermeño J, Reyes-Retana R, Tovilla-Mercado J M, Leon-Villanueva V, Varela-Fascinetto G

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gómez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Dec;33(12):1757-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90279-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90279-2
PMID:9869045
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of surgical complications between two different surgical techniques for intestinal anastomosis in children.

METHODS

This was a clinically controlled, randomized study with blind follow-up from 18 to 36 months performed at the Reference Government Hospital in Mexico City. Eighty-six children required intestinal anastomosis, ages ranged between 1 month and 16 years, with emergency or elective surgery. Anastomoses of duodenum, rectum, with enteroplasty or protected with a proximal stoma were excluded. Two randomized groups were formed: (1) anastomosis with one layer of suture (Gambee stitches) and (2) with two layers of suture (first with Connel-Mayo stitches then with Lembert). Both groups were controlled in the principal variables without differences, and the follow-up concerning postoperative recovery was blind for the surgical team.

RESULTS

Forty-two cases in group 1 and 44 in group 2 were compared. Intestinal dehiscence was found in 5 of 86 (5.8%), two from group I and three from group II (P value, not significant). Surgical time for anastomosis with one layer was an average of 26 minutes versus 43 minutes with two layers (P<.001). There were no stenoses within the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

This study proves that intestinal anastomosis with one layer of suture is as safe as anastomosis with two layers in children, and the time spent for completion of the procedure is significantly less with one plane of suture. For those reasons, it is the method of choice for intestinal anastomosis in children.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较两种不同小儿肠吻合手术技术的手术并发症发生率。

方法

这是一项在墨西哥城参考政府医院进行的临床对照随机研究,进行了18至36个月的盲法随访。86名儿童需要进行肠吻合术,年龄在1个月至16岁之间,接受急诊或择期手术。十二指肠、直肠吻合术,伴有肠成形术或近端造口保护的病例被排除。形成了两个随机组:(1)单层缝合吻合术(甘比缝合法)和(2)双层缝合吻合术(先用康奈尔-梅奥缝合法,然后用伦伯特缝合法)。两组在主要变量上得到控制且无差异,手术团队对术后恢复情况的随访是盲法进行的。

结果

比较了第1组的42例和第2组的44例。86例中有5例(5.8%)发生肠裂开,其中第1组2例,第2组3例(P值,无统计学意义)。单层吻合术的手术时间平均为26分钟,而双层吻合术为43分钟(P<0.001)。随访期间无狭窄发生。

结论

本研究证明,小儿单层缝合肠吻合术与双层缝合吻合术一样安全,且单层缝合完成手术的时间明显更短。基于这些原因,它是小儿肠吻合术的首选方法。

相似文献

1
Intestinal anastomosis in children: a comparative study between two different techniques.儿童肠吻合术:两种不同技术的比较研究
J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Dec;33(12):1757-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90279-2.
2
[Healing in the intestinal anastomosis--comparison of the Albert-Lembert and Gambee methods].[肠道吻合的愈合——阿尔贝-伦贝特法与甘比法的比较]
J UOEH. 2000 Mar 1;22(1):1-6. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.22.1.
3
In vitro comparison of three suture techniques for anastomosis of the equine small intestine.马小肠吻合术三种缝合技术的体外比较
Equine Vet J Suppl. 2011 Nov(40):46-50. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00494.x.
4
Single-layer continuous versus two-layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis: a prospective randomized trial.单层连续与双层间断肠吻合术:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2000 Jun;231(6):832-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200006000-00007.
5
[Characteristics of surgical sutures in the duodenum and small intestine].[十二指肠和小肠手术缝线的特点]
Acta Chir Iugosl. 1994;41(2 Suppl 2):239-42.
6
Use of a single layer extramucosal suture for intestinal anastomosis in children.单层浆肌层缝合在儿童肠道吻合术中的应用。
Br J Surg. 1985 Jun;72(6):483-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800720626.
7
The comparative study of the outcomes of early and late oral feeding in intestinal anastomosis surgeries in children.儿童肠吻合手术中早期与晚期经口喂养结局的比较研究
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2013 Apr-Jun;10(2):74-7. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.115025.
8
Small bowel anastomosis with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring and manual suture: a prospective, randomized study.使用生物可降解吻合环和手工缝合进行小肠吻合术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
World J Surg. 1992 Sep-Oct;16(5):1006-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02067019.
9
[Continuous intestinal suture with polydioxanone].
Zentralbl Chir. 1991;116(9):593-600.
10
[Single-layer colonic anastomoses using polyglyconate (Maxon) vs. two-layer anastomoses using chromic catgut and silk. Experimental study].[使用聚乙醇酸酯(马克松)的单层结肠吻合术与使用铬制肠线和丝线的双层吻合术。实验研究]
Rev Invest Clin. 2006 May-Jun;58(3):198-203.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the two intestinal anastomosis methods in pediatric patients.小儿患者两种肠道吻合方法的比较。
Open Med (Wars). 2025 Aug 29;20(1):20241055. doi: 10.1515/med-2024-1055. eCollection 2025.
2
Single-layer vs Double-layer Intestinal Anastomosis: A Prospective Comparative Study.单层与双层肠吻合术:一项前瞻性对比研究。
Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2025 Jan-Jun;15(1):18-23. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1464. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
3
Asymmetric figure-of-eight single-layer suture technique for intestinal anastomosis: A preliminary study.
用于肠吻合术的不对称8字形单层缝合技术:一项初步研究。
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 13;10:1109751. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1109751. eCollection 2023.
4
An alternative asymmetric figure-of-eight single-layer suture technique for bowel anastomosis in an porcine model.猪模型中一种用于肠道吻合的替代性不对称8字单层缝合技术。
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 28;9:896542. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.896542. eCollection 2022.
5
Reduced rate of dehiscence after implementation of a novel technique for creating colonic anastomosis in pediatric patients undergoing intestinal anastomosis in a single institute.在一家机构中,对接受肠道吻合术的儿科患者实施一种新型结肠吻合术创建技术后,裂开率降低。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(19):e15577. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015577.
6
Mid-term absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for gastrointestinal anastomosis - PROMEGAT - A single-arm prospective observational study.中期可吸收单丝用于胃肠吻合术是安全有效的——PROMEGAT——一项单臂前瞻性观察研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2018 Apr 6;30:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.04.003. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
Single layered intestinal anastomosis: a safe and economic technique.单层肠吻合术:一种安全且经济的技术。
Indian J Surg. 2013 Aug;75(4):290-3. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0487-7. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
8
Single layer versus double layer suture anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract.胃肠道单层与双层缝合吻合术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD005477. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005477.pub4.
9
Colostomy closure: how to avoid complications.结肠造口关闭术:如何避免并发症。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2010 Nov;26(11):1087-92. doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2690-6.
10
Unnecessary gastric decompression in distal elective bowel anastomoses in children: a randomized study.儿童远端择期肠吻合术中不必要的胃减压:一项随机研究。
World J Surg. 2010 May;34(5):947-53. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0442-3.