Lin C C
School of Nursing, Taipei Medical College, Taiwan, ROC.
Clin J Pain. 1998 Dec;14(4):303-10. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199812000-00006.
The purposes of this study were to explore the differences between chronic cancer pain and chronic low back pain with respect to (a) the use of coping strategies to manage pain and (b) the relationship between self-efficacy for attenuating pain and pain outcomes.
Descriptive correlational design.
Eighty-five patients experiencing chronic low back pain (n = 85) and 88 patients with chronic cancer pain (n = 88) were recruited for this study.
Modified Coping Strategies Questionnaire, self-efficacy expectancies, and the Brief Pain Inventory.
The major findings of this study were that (a) patients with chronic cancer pain reported significantly lower pain intensity and pain interference than did patients with chronic low back pain; (b) the most frequently used coping strategies were almost the same between the low back pain group and the cancer pain group; (c) for both chronic cancer pain and chronic low back pain groups, patients' perceived self-efficacy was significantly inversely correlated with pain intensity and pain interference with daily life; and (d) patients' use of coping strategies was positively correlated with pain intensity and pain interference with daily life. These findings were discussed in terms of implications for clinical practice and future research.
本研究的目的是探讨慢性癌痛与慢性腰痛在以下方面的差异:(a)用于管理疼痛的应对策略的使用情况;(b)减轻疼痛的自我效能感与疼痛结果之间的关系。
描述性相关性设计。
本研究招募了85名慢性腰痛患者(n = 85)和88名慢性癌痛患者(n = 88)。
改良应对策略问卷、自我效能期望和简明疼痛量表。
本研究的主要发现为:(a)慢性癌痛患者报告的疼痛强度和疼痛干扰显著低于慢性腰痛患者;(b)腰痛组和癌痛组最常使用的应对策略几乎相同;(c)对于慢性癌痛组和慢性腰痛组,患者感知到的自我效能感与疼痛强度和对日常生活的疼痛干扰均显著负相关;(d)患者应对策略的使用与疼痛强度和对日常生活的疼痛干扰呈正相关。从对临床实践和未来研究的意义方面对这些发现进行了讨论。