Nielsen J, Arendt-Nielsen L
Laboratory for Experimental Pain Research, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Denmark.
Somatosens Mot Res. 1998;15(3):220-9. doi: 10.1080/08990229870781.
An important aspect of experimental pain research is that the assessment methods can investigate the different aspects of pain perception. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of rate of temperature change and peak stimulus duration on heat evoked pain intensity and quality. All stimuli were applied within the medial aspect of the anterior forearm. The rate of temperature change was varied from 1 to 16 degrees C/s without any effect on the pain threshold. The pain threshold decreased with an increasing peak stimulus duration from 0.1 to 2 s, but not from 2 to 3 s. The pain intensity for suprathreshold stimuli (46 degrees C, 48 degrees C, 50 degrees C) increased for decreasing rates and increasing duration. The pain intensity was highly correlated with the energy of the stimulus. When the rates of temperature change (1-16 degrees C/s) are varied, no differences between pricking and burning pain were present at either low stimulus intensity (46 degrees C) or high stimulus intensity (50 degrees C). At low stimulus intensity (46 degrees C), the pricking pain was not influenced by the duration (0.1-3 s), but the burning pain was intensified when the duration was increased from 1.5 to 3 s. At high intensity stimuli (50 degrees C), the pricking pain intensified with an increased duration, whereas burning pain did not. The heat pain threshold is influenced by the peak stimulus duration, and not by the rate of temperature change. If suprathreshold stimuli are used, both the rate of temperature change and the peak stimulus duration can strongly affect the pain intensity and the pain quality. Therefore, the same stimulus modality can be used to assess the modulation of different pain intensities and of the pricking and burning pain qualities simply by varying the stimulus configuration.
实验性疼痛研究的一个重要方面是评估方法能够探究疼痛感知的不同方面。本研究的目的是调查温度变化速率和峰值刺激持续时间对热诱发疼痛强度和性质的影响。所有刺激均施加在前臂内侧。温度变化速率在1至16℃/秒之间变化,对疼痛阈值没有任何影响。疼痛阈值随着峰值刺激持续时间从0.1秒增加到2秒而降低,但从2秒增加到3秒时则没有降低。阈上刺激(46℃、48℃、50℃)的疼痛强度随着速率降低和持续时间增加而增加。疼痛强度与刺激能量高度相关。当温度变化速率(1 - 16℃/秒)变化时,在低刺激强度(46℃)或高刺激强度(50℃)下,刺痛和灼痛之间均无差异。在低刺激强度(46℃)下,刺痛不受持续时间(0.1 - 3秒)影响,但当持续时间从1.5秒增加到3秒时,灼痛会加剧。在高刺激强度(50℃)下,刺痛随着持续时间增加而加剧,而灼痛则不然。热痛阈值受峰值刺激持续时间影响,而不受温度变化速率影响。如果使用阈上刺激,温度变化速率和峰值刺激持续时间均可强烈影响疼痛强度和疼痛性质。因此,通过改变刺激配置,相同的刺激方式可用于评估不同疼痛强度以及刺痛和灼痛性质的调制。