Suppr超能文献

肝内胆管狭窄对肝内胆管结石肝切除疗效的临床意义

Clinical significance of intrahepatic biliary stricture in efficacy of hepatic resection for intrahepatic stones.

作者信息

Kim K H, Sung C K, Park B G, Kim W G, Ryu S K, Kim K S, Paik I S, Oh C H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Dong Kang General Hospital, 123-3 Tae Wha Dong, Chung Ku, Ulsan, 681-320 South Korea.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1998;5(3):303-8. doi: 10.1007/s005340050050.

Abstract

In the Far East, hepatic resection is the definitive treatment for complicated intrahepatic stones (IHS). However, many investigators have reported that the associated intrahepatic biliary stricture is the main cause of treatment failure. A retrospective comparative study was undertaken to clarify the long-term efficacy of hepatic resection for treatment of IHS and to investigate the clinical significance of intrahepatic biliary stricture in treatment failure after hepatic resection performed in 44 patients with symptomatic IHS. The patients were divided into two study groups: group A, with intrahepatic biliary stricture (n = 28) and group B, without stricture (n = 16). Residual or recurrent stones, recurrence of intrahepatic biliary stricture, late cholangitis, and final outcomes were analyzed and compared statistically between the two groups. The patients were followed up for a median duration of 65 months after hepatectomy. The overall incidence of residual or recurrent stones was 36% and 11%, respectively, in groups A and B. The initial treatment failure rate was 50% in group A and 31% in group B. Intrahepatic biliary stricture recurred in 46% of patients in group A, while none of the group B patients had biliary stricture recurrence (P = 0.001). More than two-thirds of the restrictures in group A were identified at the primary site. The incidence of late cholangitis was higher in group A (54%) than in group B (6%) (P = 0. 002). Three-quarters of the patients with cholangitis in group A had severe cholangitis, that was recurrent, and related to stones and strictures (n = 11). They and 2 asymptomatic patients in group B required secondary procedures done at a median of 12 months after hepatectomy. Final outcomes after hepatectomy with or without secondary management were good in 80%, fair in 16%, and poor in 4% of our 44 patients. Most recurrent cholangitis after hepatectomy in patients with IHS was related to recurrent intrahepatic ductal strictures. Therefore, to be effective, hepatic resection should include the strictured duct. However, with hepatectomy alone it is difficult to clear the IHS or relieve the ductal strictures completely, particularly in patients with bilateral IHS, so perioperative team approaches that include both radiologic and cholangioscopic interventions should be combined for the effective management of IHS.

摘要

在远东地区,肝切除术是治疗复杂性肝内胆管结石(IHS)的决定性方法。然而,许多研究者报告称,相关的肝内胆管狭窄是治疗失败的主要原因。本研究进行了一项回顾性比较研究,以阐明肝切除术治疗IHS的长期疗效,并探讨肝内胆管狭窄在44例有症状IHS患者肝切除术后治疗失败中的临床意义。患者被分为两个研究组:A组,有肝内胆管狭窄(n = 28);B组,无狭窄(n = 16)。分析并比较两组患者的残余或复发性结石、肝内胆管狭窄复发、晚期胆管炎及最终结局。肝切除术后,对患者进行了中位时间为65个月的随访。A组和B组残余或复发性结石的总体发生率分别为36%和11%。A组的初始治疗失败率为50%,B组为31%。A组46%的患者肝内胆管狭窄复发,而B组患者无胆管狭窄复发(P = 0.001)。A组超过三分之二的狭窄位于原发部位。A组晚期胆管炎的发生率(54%)高于B组(6%)(P = 0.002)。A组四分之三的胆管炎患者患有严重胆管炎,呈复发性,且与结石和狭窄有关(n = 11)。他们以及B组的2例无症状患者在肝切除术后中位时间12个月时需要进行二次手术。在我们的44例患者中,肝切除术后无论是否进行二次处理,最终结局良好的占80%,中等的占16%,差的占4%。IHS患者肝切除术后大多数复发性胆管炎与复发性肝内胆管狭窄有关。因此,为了取得疗效,肝切除术应包括狭窄的胆管。然而,仅靠肝切除术很难完全清除IHS或解除胆管狭窄,特别是双侧IHS患者,因此应结合包括放射学和胆道镜干预在内的围手术期团队方法来有效治疗IHS。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验