Tar B A, Steurer J
Departement für Innere Medizin, Medizinische Poliklinik, Universitätsspital Zürich.
Praxis (Bern 1994). 1998 Dec 10;87(50):1741-8.
Diagnostic costs have been investigated in a prospective study based on symptoms and diagnoses of 1000 patients of the medical outpatient clinic. The two most common reasons for consultation were abdominal and chest complaints and diseases of the cardiovascular and digestive system respectively. The most frequent cases concerned patients without definitive diagnosis (i.e. diarrhea of undetermined origin). When costs of diagnostic procedures were grouped according to symptoms constipation and abdominal complaints ranged first with costs of 880 SFr. If costs were determined on the basis of the definitive diagnosis duodenal and gastric ulcers and pneumonia were the most expensive (ca. 1000 SFr), common cold or upper airway infections the cheapest diagnoses (ca. 400 SFr). Both methods for cost estimate either according to symptoms or according to diagnosis had high variances. The maximal expense was in some examples 50 times higher than the minimal cost. These results show that diagnostic costs can not be determined in advance and that flat rates per case are problematic.
在一项前瞻性研究中,基于一家医疗门诊1000名患者的症状和诊断情况对诊断成本进行了调查。最常见的两个就诊原因分别是腹部和胸部不适以及心血管和消化系统疾病。最常见的病例是那些没有明确诊断的患者(即病因不明的腹泻)。当根据症状对诊断程序的成本进行分组时,便秘和腹部不适的成本最高,为880瑞士法郎。如果根据最终诊断确定成本,十二指肠和胃溃疡以及肺炎是最昂贵的(约1000瑞士法郎),普通感冒或上呼吸道感染是最便宜的诊断(约400瑞士法郎)。根据症状或诊断进行成本估算的两种方法都有很大差异。在某些例子中,最大费用比最低成本高出50倍。这些结果表明,诊断成本无法预先确定,而且按病例收取固定费用存在问题。