Asai A, Miura Y, Tanabe N, Kurihara M, Fukuhara S
Department of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Kyoto University School of Medicine, Japan.
Eur J Cancer. 1998 Sep;34(10):1582-6. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00148-8.
The purpose of our survey was to investigate the experience of physicians regarding advance directives and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. A postal questionnaire was sent to 500 Japanese physicians who were most involved in medical care of terminal patients. A total of 339 (68%) physicians responded. In dealing with terminal patients, approximately half gave priority to their patients' wishes for medical care, if known, regardless of the patient's competency. Of the respondents, 149 had been presented with advance directives by their patients and 35% followed all advance directives presented in their practice. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for arrested patients to enable their family to be at the bedside at the time of the death was common. More than 60% of the respondents thought that active euthanasia and assisted suicide were never ethically justified. Our study indicates that the wishes of patients are currently not always given top priority in medical decisions concerning the end of life.
我们此次调查的目的是探究医生在生前预嘱及其他有关临终医疗决策方面的经历。我们向500名深度参与晚期患者医疗护理工作的日本医生发送了邮寄问卷。共有339名(68%)医生回复。在处理晚期患者问题时,如果知晓患者的医疗护理意愿,约半数医生会优先考虑患者意愿,而不考虑患者的行为能力。在回复者中,149名曾收到患者的生前预嘱,其中35%在实际工作中遵循了所有收到的生前预嘱。为濒死患者进行心肺复苏(CPR)以使家属能在患者死亡时陪伴在床边的情况很常见。超过60%的回复者认为主动安乐死和协助自杀在伦理上绝不合理。我们的研究表明,在当前有关临终的医疗决策中,患者的意愿并非总是被置于首要位置。