DiNardo L J, Kaylie D M, Isaacson J
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical College of Virginia/Virginia Commonwealth University, 23298-0146, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Jan;120(1):30-7. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70366-9.
Controversy regarding the management of early laryngeal carcinoma persists in the absence of a definitive comparison of treatment modalities. This study examines the basic management practices for early laryngeal cancer among the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery membership with an emphasis on the role of conservation surgery.
Questionnaires were randomly distributed to 3000 members with 1000 responses. The results were collated and statistically evaluated with multivariable frequency analysis.
For operable supraglottic tumors, supraglottic laryngectomy was advocated by 41.6% of those responding. Definitive radiation therapy was suggested by 5.3% of participants and total laryngectomy by 1.4%. Explanation of treatment options with the patient deciding the therapy was selected by 48.3% of responders. For suitable glottic tumors, hemilaryngectomy was recommended by 37.1%, definitive radiation therapy by 8.1%, total laryngectomy by 1.9%, and patient choice by 50.4% of members completing the survey. When patients were left to weigh the treatment options, surgery was much less likely to be chosen than if it was advocated by the physician. Trends were evident according to practice region and setting, but these variables did not correlate strongly with physician recommendations. However, date of residency completion and rating of available radiation oncology services were significant factors. The evaluation of postoperative considerations in laryngeal conservation surgery demonstrated large variability in the definition of a close margin and the perceived need for additional therapy.
The varied practice patterns among the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery membership reflect the lack of a comparative outcome analysis for the treatment of early laryngeal carcinoma. Consequently, the full reliance on patient choice, which is more pronounced among young physicians, and cost considerations may have the greatest impact on the future treatment of this disease.
由于缺乏对治疗方式的明确比较,早期喉癌的治疗管理仍存在争议。本研究调查了美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会会员对早期喉癌的基本治疗方法,重点关注保留手术的作用。
向3000名会员随机发放问卷,共收到1000份回复。对结果进行整理,并采用多变量频率分析进行统计学评估。
对于可手术的声门上肿瘤,41.6%的受访者主张行声门上喉切除术。5.3%的参与者建议行根治性放疗,1.4%建议行全喉切除术。48.3%的受访者选择向患者解释治疗方案并由患者决定治疗方法。对于合适的声门肿瘤,37.1%的受访者推荐行半喉切除术,8.1%推荐行根治性放疗,1.9%推荐行全喉切除术,50.4%的受访者选择由患者自行选择。当让患者权衡治疗方案时,与医生推荐相比,选择手术的可能性要小得多。根据执业地区和环境存在明显趋势,但这些变量与医生的建议没有很强的相关性。然而,住院医师培训完成日期和现有放射肿瘤学服务的评级是重要因素。对喉保留手术术后注意事项的评估表明,切缘接近的定义和额外治疗的必要性存在很大差异。
美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会会员的不同治疗模式反映出早期喉癌治疗缺乏比较性结局分析。因此,完全依赖患者选择(在年轻医生中更为明显)和成本考虑可能对该疾病的未来治疗产生最大影响。