Suppr超能文献

西索米星三种给药途径的比较研究。

Comparative study of three routes of administration of sisomicin.

作者信息

Meunier-Carpentier F, Staquet M, Klastersky J

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 1976 Nov-Dec;16(11-12):625-30. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1976.tb01501.x.

Abstract

A comparative study was performed using three routes of administration of sisomicin (1 mg/kg as single dose): intramuscular injection, intravenous rapid injection, and 1-hour infusion. Intravenous administration resulted in higher blood levels immediately after the injections than by the intramuscular route; however, later, the intramuscular injection resulted in optimal blood levels. High levels of sisomicin which were bactericidal for most Gram-negative bacilli were found in the urine of the treated patients. The antimicrobial activity of the serum obtained 1 hour after administration of sisomicin, as determined against 20 strains of Gram-negative microorganisms isolated from blood cultures, was identical with all three routes of administration of sisomicin.

摘要

使用西索米星三种给药途径(单剂量1mg/kg)进行了一项对比研究:肌肉注射、静脉快速注射和1小时输注。静脉给药后立即产生的血药浓度高于肌肉注射途径;然而,随后肌肉注射产生了最佳血药浓度。在接受治疗患者的尿液中发现了对大多数革兰氏阴性杆菌具有杀菌作用的高浓度西索米星。给药1小时后获得的血清针对从血培养物中分离出的20株革兰氏阴性微生物测定的抗菌活性,在西索米星的所有三种给药途径中是相同的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验