Gill P W, Murphy A M
Med J Aust. 1976 Aug 28;2(9):329-33. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1976.tb130219.x.
After type A influenza virus had undergone major antigenic change in mid 1968, it was noted that individuals previously infected by strains of the old subtype (Asian), especially late strains, appeared to be unexpectedly resistant to clinical attack by the new subtype (Hong Kong). Prospective studies have since shown that, during the A/England/42/72 influenza epidemic of 1972, in which the incidence was approximately 7% in the community, clinical influenza due to this virus was not found in 229 subjects previously confirmed as having had A/Hong Kong/1/68 influenza, even though vaccine which had been effective against A/Hong Kong/1/68 was ineffective against A/England/42/72. During the A/Port Chalmers/1/73 influenza epidemic of 1974, clinical influenza resulting from Port Chalmers virus was not found in a closely monitored group of 176 unvaccinated subjects previously infected by A/Hong Kong/1/68 or A/England/42/72, although laboratory studies demonstrated Port Chalmers infection in five of these (2-8%). By contrast, among 99 subjects who had no such history of earlier infection, 22 developed laboratory-proven Port Chalmers influenza and most of them had typical illness.
1968年年中甲型流感病毒发生重大抗原变异后,人们注意到,以前感染过旧亚型(亚洲型)毒株,尤其是晚期毒株的个体,似乎对新亚型(香港型)的临床侵袭具有意想不到的抵抗力。此后的前瞻性研究表明,在1972年A/英格兰/42/72流感流行期间,社区发病率约为7%,在229名先前确诊感染过A/香港/1/68流感的受试者中,未发现由该病毒引起的临床流感,尽管对A/香港/1/68有效的疫苗对A/英格兰/42/72无效。在1974年A/查尔姆斯港/1/73流感流行期间,在一组176名未接种疫苗且先前感染过A/香港/1/68或A/英格兰/42/72的密切监测受试者中,未发现由查尔姆斯港病毒引起的临床流感,尽管实验室研究表明其中5人(2.8%)感染了查尔姆斯港病毒。相比之下,在99名没有这种早期感染史的受试者中,22人经实验室证实感染了查尔姆斯港流感,其中大多数人患有典型疾病。