Zsambok J, Hammer D, Rojahn J
The Ohio State University, USA.
Am J Ment Retard. 1999 Jan;104(1):88-92. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(1999)104<0088:PYMWYM>2.0.CO;2.
We compared direct (a survey) and indirect (mock petition drive) attitude measures regarding opening a group home for people with mental retardation in the neighborhood. We systematically assigned participants to one of three groups: positively worded petition statement, negative statement, or no petition. All participants answered survey questions about attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Order of the measures was counterbalanced in the first two groups. The point-biserial correlation between the petition response and survey was a moderate .40, suggesting that the survey was not a very reliable predictor of how people would react when asked whether they agreed or objected to a group home being opened in their neighborhood. Survey responses were influenced further by the wording of the petition drive statement.
我们比较了关于在社区为智障人士开设集体之家的直接态度测量方法(一项调查)和间接态度测量方法(模拟请愿活动)。我们将参与者系统地分为三组之一:措辞积极的请愿声明组、消极声明组或无请愿组。所有参与者都回答了关于对残疾人态度的调查问题。在前两组中,测量的顺序是平衡的。请愿回应与调查之间的点二列相关系数为中等的0.40,这表明该调查并不是人们在被问及是否同意或反对在其社区开设集体之家时会如何反应的非常可靠的预测指标。调查回应还受到请愿活动声明措辞的进一步影响。