Bumpass L L
Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1997 Jul-Aug;29(4):177-80.
A factorial experiment examined the effects of the wording and sequence of survey questions on the measurement of attitudes toward abortion. When a first-trimester pregnancy is specified, 55% of respondents agree that a woman should be able to obtain a legal abortion for any reason, compared with 44% when no pregnancy duration is stated. Specifying first-trimester pregnancies has little effect on the proportion of respondents who agree that abortion should be available for maternal health, fetal defects or rape, but it significantly increases the proportion who agree that a woman should be able to obtain an abortion if she is single, has financial constraints or wants no more children. When gestational lengths from one to six months are presented to respondents in ascending order, agreement that a woman should be able to obtain an abortion for any reason is lower for any given length of gestation than when pregnancy durations are presented in descending order. Forty-eight percent of respondents agree that abortion should be legal for any reason when that question is posed after a series of specific reasons; however, 60% do so when it is the first question in the sequence. The difference in agreement with abortion for any reason between Catholics and non-Baptist Protestants, and between Republicans and Democrats, is much smaller when the question is asked first than when it is presented last.
一项析因实验研究了调查问卷问题的措辞和顺序对堕胎态度测量的影响。当明确为孕早期时,55%的受访者同意女性应能够因任何原因获得合法堕胎,而未提及孕期时长时这一比例为44%。明确孕早期对同意因母体健康、胎儿缺陷或强奸而可堕胎的受访者比例影响不大,但显著增加了同意单身女性、经济困难女性或不想再要孩子的女性应能够获得堕胎的受访者比例。当向受访者按升序呈现1至6个月的孕期长度时,对于任何给定的孕期长度,同意女性应能够因任何原因获得堕胎的比例都低于按降序呈现孕期时长时的比例。当关于堕胎应因任何原因合法化的问题在一系列具体原因之后提出时,48%的受访者表示同意;然而,当该问题是序列中的第一个问题时,60%的受访者表示同意。当该问题首先被提出时,天主教徒与非浸信会新教徒之间以及共和党人与民主党人之间在同意因任何原因堕胎方面的差异,比最后提出该问题时小得多。