Suppr超能文献

针灸治疗纤维肌痛有效吗?

Is acupuncture effective in the treatment of fibromyalgia?

作者信息

Berman B M, Ezzo J, Hadhazy V, Swyers J P

机构信息

Complementary Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21207, USA.

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1999 Mar;48(3):213-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We conducted this study to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), report any adverse effects, and generate hypotheses for future investigation.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Manual Therapy Information System, the Cochrane registry, the University of Maryland Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Pain, the Centralized Information Service for Complementary Medicine, and the National Institutes of Health Office of Alternative Medicine databases for the key words "acupuncture" and "fibromyalgia." Conference abstracts, citation lists, and letters supplemented the search. We selected all randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials, or cohort studies of patients with FMS who were treated with acupuncture. Methodologic quality, sample characteristics, type of acupuncture treatment, and outcomes were extracted. Statistical pooling was not performed because of the differences in control groups.

RESULTS

Seven studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 4 cohort studies) were included; only one was of high methodologic quality. The high-quality study suggests that real acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture for relieving pain, increasing pain thresholds, improving global ratings, and reducing morning stiffness of FMS, but the duration of benefit following the acupuncture treatment series is not known. Some patients report no benefit, and a few report an exacerbation of FMS-related pain. Lower-quality studies were consistent with these findings. Booster doses of acupuncture to maintain benefit once regular treatments have stopped have been described anecdotally but not investigated in controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The limited amount of high-quality evidence suggests that real acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture for improving symptoms of patients with FMS. However, because this conclusion is based on a single high-quality study, further high-quality randomized trials are needed to provide more robust data on effectiveness.

摘要

背景

我们开展本研究以评估针刺治疗纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)的有效性,报告任何不良反应,并为未来研究提出假设。

方法

我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、手法治疗信息系统、Cochrane注册库、马里兰大学疼痛补充与替代医学数据库、补充医学集中信息服务库以及美国国立卫生研究院替代医学办公室数据库,以查找关键词“针刺”和“纤维肌痛”。会议摘要、引文列表及信函补充了检索。我们选择了所有随机或半随机对照试验,或对接受针刺治疗的FMS患者进行的队列研究。提取了方法学质量、样本特征、针刺治疗类型及结果。由于对照组存在差异,未进行统计合并。

结果

纳入7项研究(3项随机对照试验和4项队列研究);仅有1项研究方法学质量高。高质量研究表明,真针刺在缓解疼痛、提高疼痛阈值、改善整体评分及减轻FMS患者晨僵方面比假针刺更有效,但针刺治疗系列后的获益持续时间未知。一些患者报告无获益,少数患者报告FMS相关疼痛加重。低质量研究与这些结果一致。曾有轶事描述在常规治疗停止后给予强化针刺剂量以维持获益,但未在对照试验中进行研究。

结论

有限的高质量证据表明,真针刺在改善FMS患者症状方面比假针刺更有效。然而,由于这一结论基于单一高质量研究,需要进一步开展高质量随机试验以提供关于有效性的更有力数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验