Witteveen P O, Jacobs H M, van Groenestijn M A, Lodder A C, van Boxtel A H, Nieuwland M, Post M W, Touw-Otten F W, Blijham G H
Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Oncology, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Support Care Cancer. 1999 Mar;7(2):64-70. doi: 10.1007/s005200050228.
In 1992 a project was started in which home care technology was made available to patients with cancer or serious infections. Primary care providers were trained and supported to administer parenteral drugs and fluids in the home setting. Between 1992 and 1995 we applied the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) as questionnaires for quality of life (QoL) assessment in a group of 112 hospitalized patients who were prepared to receive further treatment at home. Scores on the RSCL revealed a high level of symptomatology in both the physical and the psychological dimension. Factor analysis showed a five-factor rather than a two-factor structure. The SIP showed considerable restrictions in daily living, particularly in the physical dimension. Whereas the RSCL and the SIP correlated well in the psychological and physical dimensions in advanced cancer patients, this correlation disappeared in the group of endstage cancer patients. The data indicate that the health-related QoL of end-stage cancer patients cannot be reliably be assessed with a symptom-based instrument alone; it needs to be supplemented by other instruments, such as the SIP.
1992年启动了一个项目,为癌症患者或严重感染患者提供家庭护理技术。对初级护理提供者进行培训并提供支持,以便他们在家庭环境中给予患者肠胃外药物和补液。1992年至1995年间,我们将鹿特丹症状清单(RSCL)和疾病影响量表(SIP)作为生活质量(QoL)评估问卷,应用于一组准备在家接受进一步治疗的112名住院患者。RSCL的得分显示,患者在身体和心理维度上都有较高的症状水平。因子分析显示为五因素结构而非两因素结构。SIP显示患者在日常生活中受到相当大的限制,尤其是在身体维度方面。晚期癌症患者中,RSCL和SIP在心理和身体维度上相关性良好,但在终末期癌症患者组中这种相关性消失了。数据表明,仅用基于症状的工具无法可靠地评估终末期癌症患者与健康相关的生活质量;还需要用其他工具进行补充,比如SIP。