Hardy J R, Edmonds P, Turner R, Rees E, A'Hern R
Department of Palliative Medicine, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London and Surrey, United Kingdom.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999 Aug;18(2):79-84. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(99)00050-0.
The Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL), which measures both physical and psychological aspects of quality of life (QOL), was given to all new patients admitted to a palliative care unit who were thought capable of filling out a questionnaire as an outcome measure of symptom control. Assessments were obtained from 52 patients at baseline (week 1). This represented only 53% of the new patients admitted to the unit. Thirty-one patients completed a second questionnaire at week 2, and only 28 patients completed a third (week 3). In these selected patients, the median overall RSCL scores were 57, 52, and 49 at weeks 1, 2, and 3. There was a significant improvement in QOL scores across the three measurements with a significant difference between weeks 1 and 3 (P = 0.05) but not between weeks 1 and 2. Primarily because of the inability of many patients to complete the questionnaire and the high attrition rate, the appropriateness of this tool as a symptom control measure in palliative care patients is questioned.
鹿特丹症状清单(RSCL)用于衡量生活质量(QOL)的身体和心理方面,该清单被发放给所有入住姑息治疗病房且被认为有能力填写问卷的新患者,作为症状控制的一项结果指标。在基线期(第1周)从52名患者处获得了评估结果。这仅占该病房新入院患者的53%。31名患者在第2周完成了第二份问卷,只有28名患者完成了第三份问卷(第3周)。在这些选定的患者中,第1、2和3周的RSCL总体得分中位数分别为57、52和49。在这三次测量中,生活质量得分有显著改善,第1周和第3周之间有显著差异(P = 0.05),但第1周和第2周之间没有差异。主要由于许多患者无法完成问卷以及高失访率,该工具作为姑息治疗患者症状控制措施的适用性受到质疑。