Stein Z, Saez H, el-Sadr W, Healton C, Mannheimer S, Messeri P, Scimeca M M, Van Devanter N, Zimmerman R, Betne P
Division of Epidemiology, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
J Urban Health. 1999 Mar;76(1):62-72. doi: 10.1007/BF02344462.
Women clients of a methadone maintenance treatment clinic were targeted for an intervention aimed to reduce unsafe sex. The hierarchical model was the basis of the single intervention session, tested among 63 volunteers. This model requires the educator to discuss and demonstrate a full range of barriers that women might use for protection, ranking these in the order of their known efficacy. The model stresses that no one should go without protection. Two objections, both untested, have been voiced against the model. One is that, because of its complexity, women will have difficulty comprehending the message. The second is that, by demonstrating alternative strategies to the male condom, the educator is offering women a way out from persisting with the male condom, so that instead they will use an easier, but less effective, method of protection. The present research aimed at testing both objections in a high-risk and disadvantaged group of women. By comparing before and after performance on a knowledge test, it was established that, at least among these women, the complex message was well understood. By comparing baseline and follow-up reports of barriers used by sexually active women before and after intervention, a reduction in reports of unsafe sexual encounters was demonstrated. The reduction could be attributed directly to adoption of the female condom. Although some women who had used male condoms previously adopted the female condom, most of those who did so had not used the male condom previously. Since neither theoretical objection to the hierarchical model is sustained in this population, fresh weight is given to emphasizing choice of barriers, especially to women who are at high risk and relatively disempowered. As experience with the female condom grows and its unfamiliarity decreases, it would seem appropriate to encourage women who do not succeed with the male condom to try to use the female condom, over which they have more control.
一家美沙酮维持治疗诊所将女性客户作为干预对象,旨在减少不安全的性行为。分层模型是单次干预课程的基础,该课程在63名志愿者中进行了测试。此模型要求教育者讨论并展示女性可能用于保护自己的一系列障碍,并按照已知的有效性对这些障碍进行排序。该模型强调任何人都不应不采取保护措施。针对该模型提出了两个未经检验的反对意见。一个是,由于其复杂性,女性理解该信息会有困难。另一个是,通过展示男性避孕套之外的替代策略,教育者为女性提供了一种不再坚持使用男性避孕套的方式,这样她们反而会使用一种更简便但效果较差的保护方法。本研究旨在对这两个反对意见在高危和弱势女性群体中进行测试。通过比较知识测试前后的表现,确定至少在这些女性中,复杂的信息得到了很好的理解。通过比较干预前后性活跃女性使用障碍的基线报告和随访报告,发现不安全的性接触报告有所减少。这种减少可直接归因于女性避孕套的采用。虽然一些之前使用男性避孕套的女性改用了女性避孕套,但大多数改用女性避孕套的女性之前并未使用过男性避孕套。由于在这一人群中对分层模型的理论反对意见均未成立,则应重新重视强调对障碍的选择,尤其是对高危且相对弱势的女性。随着对女性避孕套的经验增加且其陌生感降低,鼓励那些使用男性避孕套不成功的女性尝试使用女性避孕套似乎是合适的,因为她们对女性避孕套有更多的掌控权。