Brown N, Melville M, Gray D, Young T, Munro J, Skene A M, Hampton J R
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Heart. 1999 Apr;81(4):352-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.81.4.352.
To assess the impact of myocardial infarction on quality of life in four year survivors compared to data from "community norms", and to determine factors associated with a poor quality of life.
Cohort study based on the Nottingham heart attack register.
Two district general hospitals serving a defined urban/rural population.
All patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction during 1992 and alive at a median of four years.
Short form 36 (SF 36) domain and overall scores.
Of 900 patients with an acute myocardial infarction in 1992, there were 476 patients alive and capable of responding to a questionnaire in 1997. The response rate was 424 (89. 1%). Compared to age and sex adjusted normative data, patients aged under 65 years exhibited impairment in all eight domains, the largest differences being in physical functioning (mean difference 20 points), role physical (mean difference 23 points), and general health (mean difference 19 points). In patients over 65 years mean domain scores were similar to community norms. Multiple regression analysis revealed that impaired quality of life was closely associated with inability to return to work through ill health, a need for coronary revascularisation, the use of anxiolytics, hypnotics or inhalers, the need for two or more angina drugs, a frequency of chest pain one or more times per week, and a Rose dyspnoea score of >/= 2.
The SF 36 provides valuable additional information for the practising clinician. Compared to community norms the greatest impact on quality of life is seen in patients of working age. Impaired quality of life was reported by patients unfit for work, those with angina and dyspnoea, patients with coexistent lung disease, and those with anxiety and sleep disturbances. Improving quality of life after myocardial infarction remains a challenge for physicians.
与“社区常模”数据相比,评估心肌梗死对4年存活者生活质量的影响,并确定与生活质量差相关的因素。
基于诺丁汉心脏病发作登记处的队列研究。
为特定城乡人口服务的两家地区综合医院。
1992年因急性心肌梗死入院且存活至中位时间4年的所有患者。
简明健康状况调查量表(SF-36)各领域得分及总分。
1992年900例急性心肌梗死患者中,1997年有476例存活且能够回答问卷,应答率为424例(89.1%)。与年龄和性别调整后的常模数据相比,65岁以下患者在所有8个领域均表现出功能受损,最大差异在于身体功能(平均差异20分)、角色功能(身体方面,平均差异23分)和总体健康(平均差异19分)。65岁以上患者的平均领域得分与社区常模相似。多元回归分析显示,生活质量受损与因健康不佳无法重返工作、需要进行冠状动脉血运重建、使用抗焦虑药、催眠药或吸入器、需要两种或更多抗心绞痛药物、每周胸痛发作一次或更多次以及罗斯呼吸困难评分≥2密切相关。
SF-36为临床医生提供了有价值的额外信息。与社区常模相比,对生活质量影响最大的是工作年龄的患者。不适合工作的患者、有心绞痛和呼吸困难的患者、合并肺部疾病的患者以及有焦虑和睡眠障碍的患者报告生活质量受损。心肌梗死后改善生活质量对医生来说仍然是一项挑战。