Kozlowski L T, Mehta N Y, Sweeney C T, Schwartz S S, Vogler G P, Jarvis M J, West R J
Department of Biobehavioral Health, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Tob Control. 1998 Winter;7(4):369-75. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.4.369.
The purpose was to determine filter ventilation and the nicotine content of tobacco and their contribution to machine-smoked yields of cigarettes from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
Ninety-two brands of cigarettes (32 American, 23 Canadian, and 37 British brands) were purchased at retail outlets in State College, Pennsylvania, United States, Toronto, Canada, and London, United Kingdom. A FIDUS FDT filter ventilation tester measured the percentage air-dilution from filter vents. High-pressure, liquid chromatography was used to measure the nicotine content of tobacco. Regression techniques were used to examine the contributions of tobacco nicotine content and filter ventilation to machine-smoked yields of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide (CO).
Ninety-four per cent of the American brands, 91% of the Canadian brands, and 79% of British brands were ventilated. The total nicotine content of tobacco and percent nicotine (by weight of tobacco) averaged 10.2 mg (standard error of the mean (SEM) 0.25, range: 7.2 to 13.4) and 1.5% (SEM 0.03, range 1.2 to 2) in the United States, 13.5 mg (SEM 0.49, range: 8.0 to 18.3) and 1.8% (SEM 0.06, range: 1.0 to 2.4) in Canada, 12.5 mg (SEM 0.33, range: 9 to 17.5) and 1.7% (SEM 0.04, range: 1.3 to 2.4) in the United Kingdom. Multiple regression analyses showed that ventilation was by far the largest factor influencing machine-smoked yields of tar, nicotine, and CO.
Filter ventilation appears to be the predominant method for reducing machine-smoked yields of tar, nicotine, and CO in three countries. However, some brands contain about twice as much nicotine (total content or percent nicotine) as do others, indicating that tobacco types or blends and tobacco castings can be used to manipulate nicotine content and nicotine delivery of cigarettes.
本研究旨在测定美国、加拿大和英国香烟的滤嘴通风情况、烟草中的尼古丁含量,以及它们对机器抽吸香烟产生量的影响。
在美国宾夕法尼亚州斯泰特科利奇、加拿大多伦多和英国伦敦的零售商店购买了92个品牌的香烟(32个美国品牌、23个加拿大品牌和37个英国品牌)。使用FIDUS FDT滤嘴通风测试仪测量滤嘴通风口的空气稀释百分比。采用高压液相色谱法测量烟草中的尼古丁含量。运用回归技术分析烟草尼古丁含量和滤嘴通风对机器抽吸产生的焦油、尼古丁和一氧化碳(CO)产量的影响。
94%的美国品牌、91%的加拿大品牌和79%的英国品牌香烟采用了通风设计。在美国,烟草的总尼古丁含量和尼古丁百分比(按烟草重量计算)平均分别为10.2毫克(平均标准误差(SEM)0.25,范围:7.2至13.4)和1.5%(SEM 0.03,范围1.2至2);在加拿大,分别为13.5毫克(SEM 0.49,范围:8.0至18.3)和1.8%(SEM 0.06,范围:1.0至2.4);在英国,分别为12.5毫克(SEM 0.33,范围:9至17.5)和1.7%(SEM 0.04,范围:1.3至2.4)。多元回归分析表明,通风是影响机器抽吸产生的焦油、尼古丁和CO产量的最大因素。
在这三个国家,滤嘴通风似乎是降低机器抽吸产生的焦油、尼古丁和CO产量的主要方法。然而,一些品牌香烟的尼古丁含量(总含量或尼古丁百分比)是其他品牌的两倍左右,这表明烟草类型或混合比例以及烟草等级可用于控制香烟的尼古丁含量和尼古丁释放量。