Suppr超能文献

螨虫过敏原的风险水平。它们有意义吗?

Risk levels for mite allergens. Are they meaningful?

作者信息

Custovic A, Chapman M

机构信息

North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Allergy. 1998;53(48 Suppl):71-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb05002.x.

Abstract

Allergens found in house dust are among the most common environmental antigens to which man is naturally exposed. Standardized methods for measuring allergen exposure are essential for assessing the relationship between exposure, sensitization, and the severity of asthma. Monoclonal antibody-based assays are the most widely used method for assessing allergen exposure. In the effort to define the best "index of exposure" to mite allergens, several factors need to be investigated, including: 1) whether allergen should be measured in reservoir dust or airborne 2) whether the results of reservoir measurement should be expressed as recovered allergen per unit weight or per unit area. As yet, airborne sampling is insufficiently sensitive to produce reliable and repeatable results. Therefore, measurement of house-dust-mite allergen concentration in reservoir dust should be regarded as the best-validated index of exposure. The results should be expressed and reported both per unit weight (concentration) and per unit area. The strongest predictor of chronic symptoms and acute exacerbation of asthma is sensitization to indoor allergens. A simple dose-response relationship between IgE-mediated hypersensitivity and allergen exposure has been established. For example, exposure to more than 2 microg Group 1 mite allergen/g dust should be regarded as a risk factor for the development of IgE antibody and asthma in susceptible children. The quantitative relationship between exposure and symptoms in patients already sensitized is complex due to a number of possible confounding factors (e.g., other allergens, viruses, asthma medication). A simple threshold level for provocation of asthmatic symptoms has not been clearly defined.

摘要

室内灰尘中的过敏原是人类自然接触的最常见环境抗原之一。标准化的过敏原暴露测量方法对于评估暴露、致敏与哮喘严重程度之间的关系至关重要。基于单克隆抗体的检测是评估过敏原暴露最广泛使用的方法。为了确定螨过敏原的最佳“暴露指数”,需要研究几个因素,包括:1)应在储存灰尘还是空气中测量过敏原;2)储存测量结果应以每单位重量还是每单位面积回收的过敏原表示。到目前为止,空气采样的灵敏度不足以产生可靠且可重复的结果。因此,测量储存灰尘中的屋尘螨过敏原浓度应被视为最佳验证的暴露指数。结果应以每单位重量(浓度)和每单位面积表示并报告。哮喘慢性症状和急性加重的最强预测因素是对室内过敏原的致敏。IgE介导的超敏反应与过敏原暴露之间已建立了简单的剂量反应关系。例如,接触超过2微克/克灰尘的1组螨过敏原应被视为易感儿童发生IgE抗体和哮喘的危险因素。由于一些可能的混杂因素(如其他过敏原、病毒、哮喘药物),已致敏患者中暴露与症状之间的定量关系很复杂。尚未明确界定诱发哮喘症状的简单阈值水平。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验