Dahlstrom J E, Holdsworth J, Bassett M L, Jain S
Department of Anatomical Pathology, Australian Capital Territory Pathology, Canberra, Australia.
Acta Cytol. 1999 Mar-Apr;43(2):214-7. doi: 10.1159/000330979.
To compare the cytologic characteristics of gastric mucosal cell smears prepared by air drying and rehydration prior to alcohol fixing with cells wet fixed in alcohol.
Gastric mucosal cells were obtained from 55 consecutive patients undergoing gastroscopy. Paired smears were made, one immediately fixed in 95% ethanol for 20 minutes (wet fixed [WF]) and the other air dried for at least 20 minutes prior to rehydration with normal saline for 30 seconds and fixation in 95% ethanol for 20 minutes (air dried/rehydrated/fixed [ARF]). Both slides were stained by the Papanicolaou method. Coded slides were examined blind and graded 1 (superior), 2 (satisfactory) or 3 (poor) with respect to staining of chromatin, nuclear membrane, nucleoli, cytoplasm/cell border and group morphology. Histology confirmed a benign disease process or normal mucosa.
Comparing grade 1 versus grades 2 and 3, ARF slides were significantly better than WF slides for all cytologic features (P < .05). Comparing grade 1 and 2 versus grade 3, there was no significant difference between ARF and WF slides (P > .05) (chi 2 analysis).
The cytologic features of ARF smears of gastric cells were equal or superior to those of WF smears. This method of preparing smears is simpler and avoids some of the problems of ethanol fixation of wet smears.
比较空气干燥并复水后再用酒精固定的胃黏膜细胞涂片与直接用酒精湿固定的细胞涂片的细胞学特征。
从55例连续接受胃镜检查的患者中获取胃黏膜细胞。制作配对涂片,一张立即用95%乙醇固定20分钟(湿固定[WF]),另一张先空气干燥至少20分钟,然后用生理盐水复水30秒,再用95%乙醇固定20分钟(空气干燥/复水/固定[ARF])。两张玻片均采用巴氏染色法染色。对编码玻片进行盲法检查,并根据染色质、核膜、核仁、细胞质/细胞边界及细胞群形态将其评为1级(优)、2级(良)或3级(差)。组织学检查证实为良性病变过程或正常黏膜。
比较1级与2级和3级,ARF涂片在所有细胞学特征方面均显著优于WF涂片(P <.05)。比较1级和2级与3级,ARF涂片和WF涂片之间无显著差异(P >.05)(卡方分析)。
胃细胞ARF涂片的细胞学特征等同于或优于WF涂片。这种涂片制备方法更简单,且避免了湿涂片酒精固定的一些问题。